Page 222 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 222

P1: GCV/KAA   P2: kaf
                          0521835356c07.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 21, 2004  16:24






                                                       The Three Models

                                   being in the least non-partisan. Put another way, independent jour-
                                   nalism marked the rise of the editor as a full-fledged player in the
                                   political game, instead of a politicians’ tool.

                                In the United States, the rise of newspaper circulations came just after
                                the extension of the franchise at the end of the 1920s to essentially all
                                white males, without regard to property. This was the period when mass
                                political parties developed most strongly and newspapers continued to
                                be intimately involved with them, though partisanship would begin to
                                fade late in the nineteenth century. The first generations of commercial
                                newspapers in all four countries had partisan identities and commit-
                                ments, though occasionally shifting ones, and their owners were often
                                deeply involved in party politics. Hearst, who sought the Democratic
                                nomination for president, and Lord Beaverbrook, who told the 1948
                                Royal Commission on the Press – not entirely honestly – that he ran
                                his newspapers “purely for the purpose of making propaganda” are rep-
                                resentative of this era. At the same time, the logic of the marketplace
                                clearly modified and limited the political involvement of the press and
                                its owners, encouraging them to play down open partisanship – more,
                                as we shall see, in the United States and Canada than on the other side
                                of the Atlantic – forcing them to respond to public sentiment and to
                                                    2
                                the views of advertisers and making political opinion less central to the
                                content of the paper than it had been in the early nineteenth century.
                                   It is also clearly true that the commercialization of the newspaper in
                                the Liberal countries drove out of the media system a variety of forms
                                of noncommercial media. Tocqueville wrote in Democracy in America
                                (1969: 519) that “A newspaper can survive only if it gives publicity to
                                feelings or principles common to a large number of men. A newspaper
                                therefore always represents an association whose members are its regular
                                readers.” He was presumably thinking here both of the party press and
                                of newspapers connected with a variety of other kinds of social groups.
                                The 1830s and 1840s, when the expansion of newspaper circulation be-
                                gan in the United States, was a period of reform movements (the most
                                important being the abolitionist movement) and many newspapers were
                                connectedwiththem(Nord2001).InBritain,aswehaveseen,theradical,
                                unstamped press, much of which was connected to working-class move-
                                ments, flourished while the taxes on knowledge were in effect; like the
                                American papers Tocqueville described, they died once the commercial

                                2
                                  Baldasty (1992: 75ff) discusses the influence of advertisers on the political content of
                                  nineteenth-century American newspapers.

                                                              204
   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227