Page 218 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 218

P1: GCV/KAA   P2: kaf
                          0521835356c07.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 21, 2004  16:24






                                                       The Three Models

                                a powerful boost to the practice of reading secular literature. By the early
                                eighteenth century the English political system had been fundamentally
                                changed. The king or queen could rule only through a majority in Parlia-
                                ment, which controlled public finance – previously inseparable from the
                                royal household; approved the appointment of ministers; and had the
                                exclusive right to remove judges. Extensive royal control of the economy
                                and traditional guild privileges had given way to laissez faire economic
                                policy. Religious toleration had advanced substantially. And with the
                                expiration of the Licensing Act in 1695, a major step had been taken
                                toward the development of press freedom. In terms of political culture,
                                as Hill (1961: 3) puts it, “politics had become a rational inquiry, dis-
                                cussed in terms of utility, experience, common sense, no longer in terms
                                of Divine Right, texts, antiquarian research.” The development during
                                this period of political parties and of the division between government
                                and opposition in Parliament had particularly important consequences
                                for media history. “From Queen Anne’s reign, politicians excluded from
                                power consistently used the press to mobilize public opinion and put
                                pressure on successive administrations. This in turn provoked a barrage
                                of counter-propaganda, and money raised by subscription or extracted
                                from public funds was injected into the London press from both sides”
                                (Harris 1978: 95). The first daily, the Daily Courant, was financed by the
                                government as part of this pattern of political competition.
                                   The expiration of the Licensing Act in 1695 resulted in a proliferation
                                of newspapers, twenty in London in the following decade and some in
                                the provinces as well. Political elites were uncomfortable with unchecked
                                expansion of the press, however, and after a number of failed attempts
                                by the government to reinstitute licensing, the Stamp Act of 1712
                                imposed taxes on newspapers, pamphlets, advertisements, and paper,
                                resulting in an immediate drop in the number of newspapers in circu-
                                lation. The stamp duties were raised and tightened in 1789, in 1797 –
                                following a great upsurge in radical political activity that saw massive
                                increases in the circulation of political literature – and again in 1815 and
                                1819. The same transformation of English society that led to emergence
                                of parliamentary rule also included the enclosure movement, the elim-
                                ination of old economic controls and privileges, and the expansion of
                                industrialcapitalism,andproducedgrowingeconomicinequalityandan
                                expansion of the urban and rural poor. Both the “taxes on knowledge”
                                and other controls on the press – prosecutions for seditious libel, for
                                example – were motivated to a large extent by fear of the propertied
                                classes that expansion of the press would lead to political rebellion by


                                                              200
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223