Page 215 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 215

P1: GLB/IRK/kaa  P2: KAF
                          0521835356c06.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 28, 2004  21:0






                                            The North/Central European Model

                              that political parallelism and journalistic professionalism should not be
                              collapsed into a single conceptual dimension, that high levels of both
                              can in fact coexist; or to put it a bit differently, the experience of the
                              Democratic Corporatist countries suggests that other forms of journal-
                              istic professionalism can exist, apart from the Liberal Model of neutral
                              professionalism.
                                The Democratic Corporatist countries, finally, are characterized by
                              early and strong development of liberal institutions and strong develop-
                              ment of civil society. State power has historically been limited, and this
                              fact has been reflected in early development of press freedom and other
                              elements of an open public sphere, including strong rights of access to
                              government information. At the same time, the democratic corporatist
                              bargain institutionalized a strong welfare state; and the Democratic Cor-
                              poratist countries tend to be “social states” characterized by an ideology
                              of collective responsibility for the welfare and participation of all groups
                              and citizens. This is reflected in the media field by a strong consensus that
                              the state must play a positive role as the guarantor of equal opportunities
                              of communication for all the organized social voices in pursuit of the
                              “common good.”




































                                                           197
   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220