Page 211 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 211

P1: GLB/IRK/kaa  P2: KAF
                          0521835356c06.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 28, 2004  21:0






                                            The North/Central European Model

                              of the key elements of a system of rational-legal authority is the develop-
                              ment of an administrative corps selected by qualifications rather than by
                              patronage, governed by established rules, relatively autonomous from
                              outside control, and in theory serving the nation as a whole. Such a sys-
                              tem was established by the Hohenzollerns in Brandenburg-Prussia in the
                              eighteenth century, in an effort to balance the power of the landed aris-
                              tocracy, and strengthened after the Napoleonic invasion (Shefter 1977:
                              423ff). In Scandinavia, “centralized, powerful, relatively independent
                              bureaucracy came to play a central role” (Esping-Anderson 1985: 48)
                              beginning as early as the seventeenth century, and was generally well
                              consolidated by the early nineteenth century. In Denmark, for instance,
                              “The Danish Law of 1685 standardized the payment of service dues, re-
                              placing a decentralized and personalistic system organized around the
                              landed aristocracy with a centralized and bureaucratic one run by the
                              state” (Katzenstein 1985: 159). Lægried and Olsen (1984: 210) write of
                              Norwegian civil servants, who dominated the state from the early nine-
                              teenth century:

                                Their ideology came close to what Weber later labeled an ideal bu-
                                reaucracy based on rational-legal authority. The main task of civil
                                servants was seen as the implementation of enacted rules – to find
                                the proper solution and guard the public interest, unhampered by
                                arbitrary outside pressure. The role model was the objective and
                                impartial judge, and their primary loyalty was toward an imper-
                                sonal system of laws.

                              Clientelism, meanwhile, never took strong root in most of the Demo-
                              cratic Corporatist countries (with Austria and Belgium often considered
                              as partial exceptions). 25
                                A strong tradition of rational-legal authority affects the media sys-
                              tems of Democratic Corporatist countries in several ways. First, as we
                              note in Chapter 3, the expansion of the newspaper is connected with the
                              development of rational-legal authority, as it is with the expansion of the
                              market and parliamentary democracy. Second, the relative autonomy of
                              public service broadcasting systems in Democratic Corporatist coun-
                              tries is consistent with the independent character of public institutions


                              25
                                On the absence of clientelism in Northern Europe see Papakostas (2002) and
                                Randeraad and Wolffram (2002).



                                                           193
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216