Page 58 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 58

P1: GCV/KAF/KAA  P2: kaf
                          0521835356agg.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 20, 2004  15:9






                                                      Concepts and Models

                                   AnotherinterestingexamplecomesfromIsrael(whosejournalismcan
                                trace its historical roots in part to central Europe). In 1989, the Canadian
                                publisher Hollinger, Inc. bought The Jerusalem Post, and quickly moved
                                to establish control over the political line of the English-language paper.
                                The Jerusalem Post had for many years been owned by economic institu-
                                tions connected with the Labor party – a common pattern in Europe as
                                well; Conrad Black, then the owner of Hollinger, is politically conserva-
                                tive. The editor, Erwin Frenkel, objected to the new publisher’s attempts
                                to interfere with journalistic decisions and soon resigned, as did thirty
                                               4
                                other journalists. He explained his resignation in a column in the Post
                                this way:

                                     Journalismisanenterpriseinsocialjudgment.Theobjectofthat
                                   judgment is the historical present, the fast flood of daily events.
                                   Journalism plucks from this infinite flow those events deemed
                                   worthy of public regard, reporting them as honest witness. That
                                   it calls news. It assigns such news events weights of importance
                                   and interest. And it seeks, by further interpretive judgment, to
                                   help place those events in a more explicit context of narrative
                                   understanding.
                                     It does all this on behalf of the society of which it is a part, in
                                   the conviction that the “news” it so delivers is essential feedback
                                   in helping that society best steer itself. In that sense, journalism is
                                   guardian of a public trust.
                                     In a newspaper this process of judgment is a collective effort. It
                                   has checks and balances. But judgment it remains. For that reason
                                   all newspapers have a character of their own, telling the story of the
                                   present as they perceive it.
                                     To give that collective judgment coherence and to protect it from
                                   influences that would divert it in their favour, there is the editor
                                   and his authority. In the end, it is his voice, his judgment over what
                                   is fit to print, that would save this collective process from chaos or
                                   corruption. So long as his judgment of what is fit to print is not
                                   subject to fear or favour.


                                4  The case produced an interesting judgment in Court of Labour Disputes: granting
                                  severance compensation to journalists. The judge expressed the view – commonaswe
                                  will see in many countries in Northern and Central Europe where it is sometimes
                                  referred to as internal press freedom – that press freedom requires that editors and
                                  reporters have freedom of expression and limits the right of media owners to interfere
                                  with their work.


                                                               40
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63