Page 148 - Comparing Political Communication Theories, Cases, and Challenge
P. 148

P1: Irk-Kic-JzL
                          0521828317agg.xml  CY425/Esser  0521828317  May 22, 2004  12:27






                                                          Pippa Norris

                                   THE IMPACT OF MEDIA SYSTEMS ON GOOD GOVERNANCE
                                                 AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

                                What is the impact of this pattern on good governance and human
                                development? Recent years have seen growing attempts to gauge and
                                measure systematic, valid, and reliable indicators of political develop-
                                ment and the quality of democracy in a wide range of countries world-
                                wide. We can draw on a recent study for the World Bank (Kaufman et al.
                                1999) that developed subjective perceptions of indicators of good gover-
                                nance, drawing on multiple surveys of experts, that assessed four dimen-
                                sionsbasedonthecriteriaofpoliticalstability,theruleoflaw,government
                                efficiency and levels of corruption (see the Technical Appendix for de-
                                tails). Political stability is important as this reflects the regular rotation of
                                government office, consolidation of the “rules of the game,” continuity
                                in constitutional practices, and lack of political violence due to acts of
                                terrorism.Theruleoflawconcernstheindependenceandeffectivenessof
                                the judiciary and courts, perceptions of violent or nonviolent crime, and
                                the enforceability of contracts. Government efficiency is gauged by per-
                                ceptions of the quality of the public service and the independence of the
                                civic service from political pressures. Lastly, perceptions of corruption
                                reflect the success of a society in developing fair, transparent, and pre-
                                dictablerulesforsocialandeconomicinteractions.Subjectivejudgments
                                may prove unreliable for several reasons, including reliance upon a small
                                number of national “experts,” the use of business leaders and academic
                                scholars as the basis of the judgments, variations in country coverage by
                                different indices, and possible bias toward more favorable evaluations of
                                countries with good economic outcomes. Nevertheless in the absence of
                                other reliable indicators covering a wide range of nations, such as sur-
                                veys of public opinion, these measures provide one of the best available
                                                         3
                                gauges of good governance. If widespread access to the free press plays
                                an important role in promoting government accountability, then this
                                should be evident in these indicators. Table 6.1 and Figure 6.3 show the
                                simple correlations among these indicators without any controls. The
                                results confirm that the indicators of media access, press freedom, and
                                the combined communications index were all strongly and significantly
                                related to good governance. Countries where much of the public has
                                access to the free press have the greater political stability, rule of law,
                                government efficiency in the policy process, and least corruption.

                                3
                                  It should be noted that none of the indicators that were selected included measures of
                                  freedom of the press or media access.

                                                              128
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153