Page 265 - Comparing Political Communication Theories, Cases, and Challenge
P. 265

P1: JZZ/KAB  P2: JZZ
                          0521828317c10.xml  CY425/Esser  0521828317  May 26, 2004  15:5






                                    Political Communication and Electronic Democracy

                              organizations as well as party organizations are being used as the main
                              channels for disseminating information, while direct communication
                              with constituents is considered less relevant and less desirable.
                                The narratives of those members who express this orientation suggest
                              that the focus on party is a behavioral norm deeply ingrained into the
                              hearts and souls of MPs in European national parliaments. It is hardly
                              raised as an issue or perceived as a particular problem. Some members
                              offer reasons that point to the programmatic closeness among the mem-
                              bers of a party that minimizes tensions between the individual and his
                              or her party. A Swedish MP explained when talking about her campaign:

                                My personal campaign was all based on speaking for the party. If
                                the people vote for me, they should know that they get a liberal.
                              This is different in the case of the U.S. House of Representatives. The
                              members of this legislative institution consider themselves primarily as
                              arepresentativeoftheirdistrictratherthantheirparty.Whenaskedabout
                              the goals related to the Web site of his member, a systems administrator
                              explained:

                                The goal is always to improve the communication with people in
                                [thedistrict].ItisreallygreatthatpeopleinWashingtonaremaking
                                use of the site as well but they are really not our interest. We are
                                trying to improve our communication and get information out to
                                our constituents.

                              The narratives of American respondents reveal that the decision to take
                              advantage of the Internet is based upon strategic considerations as well.
                              In contrast to respondents in Sweden and Germany, they stress electoral
                              incentives as a reason to take advantage of the Internet as a means for
                              communication with constituents. Looking back to the early beginnings
                              of his member’s Web site, a systems administrator explained:
                                In the beginning we had no real vision. My member represents
                                avery educated district close to Silicon Valley. There was a fear
                                that it might hurt him if he is not proving to be up to date with
                                technological developments.

                              Many of the respondents also pointed to the legislative structure as a fac-
                              tor that affects their choices. Some of the Swedish and German members
                              we interviewed are quite positive about the use of Web sites to communi-
                              catewithconstituents,butarguethattheycannotuseWebsitesbecauseof
                              alack of resources. These answers point toward a mechanism that clearly


                                                           245
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270