Page 83 - Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics
P. 83

74  Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics


                           which in turn is equivalent to

                                                q 1 + q 2 ≥ 0,q 1 + q 3 ≥ 0.

                           4.4 A SPECTRAL CONDITION OF SOLVABILITY

                                     n
                           Let   ∈  (R ;R ∪{+∞}). Let us recall that D( ) is nonempty and convex
                           and here is assumed to be closed. Therefore the set D( ) ∞ is a well-defined
                           nonempty closed convex cone. Let us now consider the semicomplementarity
                           problem SCP ∞ (M, ):
                                                  ⎧
                                                  ⎪ z ∈ D( ) ∞
                                                  ⎪
                                                  ⎨
                                                    Mz ∈ (D(  ∞ )) ∗                 (4.27)
                                                  ⎪
                                                  ⎪
                                                     Mz,z ≤ 0.
                                                  ⎩
                           Recall that (D(  ∞ )) denotes the dual cone of D(  ∞ ) and the second relation
                                            ∗
                           in (4.27) also reads:
                                                Mz,h ≥ 0, ∀h ∈ D(  ∞ ).
                           Note that the first relation in (4.27) involves the recession cone of the domain
                           of  , whereas the second relation in (4.27) invokes the dual cone of the domain
                           of   ∞ (and not the dual cone of the recession cone of the domain of  ).
                              Let us now first check in the following Proposition that if D( ) ∞ =
                           D(  ∞ ), then problem SCP ∞ (M, ) reduces to a complementarity problem
                           of the form
                                                                      ∗
                                             D( ) ∞   z ⊥ Mz ∈ (D( ) ∞ ) .
                                                 n
                           Proposition 14. Let   : R → R be a proper convex lower semicontinuous
                           function with closed domain, and let M ∈ R n×n .If D( ) ∞ = D(  ∞ ), then
                               n
                           z ∈ R is a solution of problem SCP ∞ (M, ) if and only if z is a solution of the
                           complementarity problem CP(M,D( ) ∞ ):
                                                  ⎧
                                                  ⎪ z ∈ D( ) ∞
                                                  ⎪
                                                  ⎨
                                                    Mz ∈ (D( ) ∞ ) ∗                 (4.28)
                                                  ⎪
                                                  ⎪
                                                     Mz,z = 0.
                                                  ⎩
                           Proof. Let z be a solution of problem SCP ∞ (M, ). Then the second relation
                           in (4.27) reads
                                                Mz,h ≥ 0,∀h ∈ D( ) ∞ ,
                           from which we deduce in particular that  Mz,z ≥ 0. This, together with the
                           third relation in (4.27), ensures that  Mz,z = 0.
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88