Page 41 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of New Media On
P. 41

10          CHAPTER 1

           If this comparison of networked writing  to the Panopticon is an
        accurate one, then writing  in linked classroom spaces continually
        requires student writers to contemplate their audience beyond the
        private exchanges with a professor or classmate or the semipublic
        interaction  with  a peer group.  Some students  may  find  that  con-
        stant observation of their words in computer-mediated writing en-
        vironments forces them to always watch their words or risk the ire
        of their classmates or others in on the discussion. When interacting
        with ideas in electronic environments, however, writers frequently
        find  they  cannot  watch  what  they  say as they  might  do in a F2F
        class. Should a discourse rule be broken, the violator will soon learn
        that classmates will watch  his or her words for the writer.
           Students in my fall 2003 writing classes connected to online envi-
        ronments proposed a new risk—the problem of trust. Theorists like
        Howard   Rheingold  (2003)  suggest that  as  students  become more
        savvy regarding electronically mediated communication, it is harder
        for  them  to trust who  is writing  on the  other  end of the  post. The
        students cited numerous violations  of trust in written  communica-
        tion found in online conversations  as promoting  the  Panoptical ef-
        fect,  from  police posing  as  teenagers  to  sting  pedophiles to  kids
        posing as psychics in a chat  room; the  ability for others to pose as
        someone they are not puts many students in a state of unease. Even
        for many who write responses online for class discussions, their con-
        cerns as to who might be on the other side of the screen is enough for
        them to watch what they   say. This may be particularly true for in-
        ternational students, who are quite concerned about the U.S. Patriot
        Act and how it could play out for them in academic settings. Conse-
        quently, writing teachers need to discuss student concerns related to
        trust,  because it  is a  vital  part  of the  communication  process. As
        Francis Fukuyama noted, "trust does not reside in integrated circuits
        or fiber optic cables" (1995, p. 25). A sense of community frequently
        can and does reside in integrated circuits, however, and if we hope to
        establish writing communities in networked environments, particu-
        larly  in educational settings, trust building needs to be part  of the
        ongoing discussions related to writing.
           A third  risk  is the  student's  use  of  silence in  an  online  environ-
        ment. In traditional  classroom spaces, frequently an instructor  can
        tell whether  a  student's  silence  means  assent,  dissent, disinterest,
        skepticism,  thoughtfulness,  or  withdrawal  by  watching  the  stu-
        dent's body language and reactions to the events surrounding  him
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46