Page 96 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of New Media On
P. 96

WHO OWNS THE WORDS?           65

        print  and  electronic. The  acronym  YOYOW  (You Own  Your  Own
        Words)  rings  true  for  many  students'  communication.  And  the
        power inherent in owning  one's words—especially in a multimedia
        world—now extends to the way    one writes in a classroom setting.
           Carla  Hesse,  writing  in  The Future  of  the  Book  (Nunberg, 1996),
        suggested that


             the  critical distinction between "the book" and  other forms of printed
             matter is not the physical form of the printed word, or the implicit set of
             social actors that it requires ...,  but  rather  the mode  of temporality
             that  the  book  form  establishes between  those actors. The book is a
             slow form  of exchange. It is a mode of temporality which conceives of
             public communication not as action, but rather as reflection upon ac-
             tion. Indeed the  book form  serves precisely to  defer  action, to widen
             the temporal gap between thought and deed, to create a space for re-
             flection  and  debate,  (p. 27)


           Hesse's point is critical for writing teachers, because much of tra-
        ditional writing depends on the  "bookish"  sense of temporality  and
        the  position  that  good  writing  takes  time  and  reflection.  Most
        compositionists  hope students create spaces for reflection and debate
        in their writing, not to act on words hastily but to think and deliber-
        ate the ideas that words  elicit.
           However, this bookish  sense of temporality  privileged in writing
        instruction is at odds with the immediacy of electronic  communica-
        tion.  E-mail, chat,  MOOs, weblogs, and the  like are not  always  re-
        flective  genres. These genres beg a call to  action  from an  audience.
        These mundane   texts  are public communication in action,  and  the
        type of writing involved in producing  such e-texts is intended to be
        both sudden and widespread. E-texts are meant to be interactive, not
        necessarily reflective. Therefore, these texts provide the writer with
        great power to inspire an immediate effect  on the audience, whether
        for  good or ill.
           This shift  in the mode of temporality for a writer, from  reflective
        to  interactive,  changes  the  role of the  student  writer  in the college
        composition classroom. Interactive writing parallels oratory, in that
        writing becomes performative. As with other  performative speech
        acts, the student writer  depends on locutionary,  illocutionary,  and
        perlocutionary  language  acts  (see Austin,  1962,  for a complete dis-
        cussion of performative speech acts). Locutionary language acts in
        cyberspace function  similarly  to other  speech contexts—the writer
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101