Page 93 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 93

60           CHAPTER 2

        World Wide Web is, well, worldwide—who can account for     all  the
        cultural  and  educational  expectations and  beliefs  a global reader-
        ship has? Certainly only  a very few spectacular writers  of the  last
        millennium have had this ability. The purpose of an e-text can be so
        many things depending on who accesses the text and when the ac-
        cessing occurs. At best, the student writer can perhaps identify the
        primary and secondary audiences her web site or postings may ad-
        dress; in some instances, a student writer may be able to provide a
        tertiary  audience for the work.  Perhaps as students'  access to and
        ability with e-texts grow in the years ahead, we can expect and de-
        mand more from    them with regard to outlining  a global audience.
        For now,  unless the writing  is produced in a limited  environment,
        like a closed BBS (Bulletin Board System) or  restricted listserv, ex-
        pecting students  to  have  a complete grasp  of the discourse  struc-
        ture needed to produce a successful web site, weblog, or MOO may
        be difficult.  This is because online class assignments really cease to
        be "class assignments" once students leave the course or post them
        to the web. In cyberspace, these earlier assignments become an arti-
        fact,  a bit of information  webbed with other bits, a declaration of
        some knowledge put   forward by a writer  who has moved on.
           All this  suggests that in networked  space, student  writers  are
        not  apprentices: They  are  writers  and  authors.  Equally, in  net-
        worked   space, instructors  are not  masters:  They too are  writers
        and authors. Thus, from a networked space a community of writ-
        ers emerges. In such a community,  how one shares authority and
        power as well as how one discusses her progress reflects the levels
        of ownership  one believes she has. Currently, in many  composi-
        tion classes—even the computer-based classes—an imbalance ex-
        ists  in  how  authority,  power,  and  ownership  are  configured in
        assessment. This is so even with the more egalitarian e-portfolio.
        Although  students  submit their best work,  often with some type
        of  reflective  element to  the  portfolio, the  true  evaluation  comes
        from the instructor and not some external audience that responds
        to the students'  texts.
           As technical convergence transforms  the present state of the  text
        in  Composition,  it  must  also  lead  to  transforming  assessment  as
        well.  In  the  future,  authentic  assessment  in  classes that  use  net-
        worked writing may require writing instructors  to relinquish some
        of their control, their power over the text, to others who are outside
        the classroom  and who wish  to comment   and critique the  student
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98