Page 6 - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers
P. 6

Preface




















         History  reminds  us  of  ancient  examples  of  fluid  dynamics  applications  such  as
         the  Roman  baths  and  aqueducts that  fulfilled  the  requirements  of the  engineers
         who built them;  of ships  of various types with adequate  hull designs, and  of wind
         energy  systems,  built  long  before  the  subject  of  fluid  mechanics  was  formalized
         by  Reynolds,  Newton,  Euler,  Navier,  Stokes, Prandtl  and  others. The  twentieth
         century  has  witnessed  many  more  examples  of  applications  of  fluid  dynamics
         for  the  use  of  humanity,  all  designed  without  the  use  of  electronic  computers.
         They  include  prime  movers  such  as internal-combustion  engines,  gas and  steam
        turbines,  flight  vehicles,  and  environmental  systems  for  pollution  control  and
         ventilation.
            Computational  Fluid  Dynamics  (CFD)  deals  with  the  numerical  analysis  of
        these  phenomena.  Despite  impressive  progress  in  recent  years,  CFD  remains
         an  imperfect  tool  in  the  comparatively  mature  discipline  of  fluid  dynamics,
        partly  because  electronic  digital  computers  have  been  in widespread  use  for  less
        than  thirty  years.  The  Navier-Stokes  equations,  which  govern  the  motion  of
         a  Newtonian  viscous  fluid  were  formulated  well  over  a  century  ago.  The  most
        straightforward  method  of attacking any  fluid dynamics problem  is to solve these
        equations  for  the  appropriate  boundary  conditions.  Analytical  solutions  are  few
        and  trivial  and,  even  with  today's  supercomputers,  numerically  exact  solution
        of the  complete  equations  for  the  three-dimensional,  time-dependent  motion  of
        turbulent  flow  is prohibitively  expensive except  for  basic research  studies  in  sim-
        ple  configurations  at  low  Reynolds  numbers.  Therefore,  the  "straightforward"
        approach  is  still  impracticable  for  engineering  purposes.
           Considering the  successes  of the  pre-computer  age, one  might  ask whether  it
        is necessary  to  gain  a greater  understanding  of  fluid  dynamics  and  develop  new
        computational  techniques,  with  their  associated  effort  and  cost.  Textbooks  on
        fluid  dynamics reveal two approaches to understanding  fluid  dynamics  processes.
        The  first  is to  devise  useful  correlations  through  a progression  from  demonstra-
        tive  experiments  to  detailed  experimental  investigations  that  yield  additional
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11