Page 47 - Conflict, Terrorism, and the Media In Asia
P. 47

36 Benjamin Cole
              these issues. Mahatir argued that


                 The situation in the Middle East remains of great concern to all of us. At the
                 root of this is the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Venting our anger by simply
                 killing people as is done by both sides will solve nothing. We need to know
                 our strengths and strategise so that every sacrifice will contribute towards our
                 ultimate success. The US-engineered road map for solving the Palestinian
                 problem would have had a better chance of success if Iraq had not been
                 invaded. As it is, there is now an Iraqi insurgency in addition to the Palestinian
                 problem. And terrorism still threatens the world.
                                                        (New Straits Times 2003d)

              The third policy is the rejection of violence as a means of redressing the problems
              facing Islam. This is pursued at a theological level by publicizing the peaceful
              aspects of Islam and the damage that is being done by its violent image in the
              wider world. The following statements give a flavour of the sort of messages that
              are regularly repeated: ‘The fundamental of Islamic teaching is peace, modera-
              tion, honesty, integrity and being friendly to others’ (Bernama 2003a); ‘there are
              groups of Muslims who have hijacked Islam and its teachings to support terror-
              ism activities’; and ‘We cannot accept Islamic extremism even if it is based on
              Islam because it is not the teachings of Islam’ (Bernama 2003b).
                The fourth and final element of the strategy is the presentation of an alternative
              vision for confronting the perceived threats to Islam that focuses on moderniza-
              tion and unity within the Muslim world and Malaysia itself. In presenting this
              vision the government co-opts the rhetoric of the Islamists – for example in terms
              of ‘defending the faith’, ‘restoring honour and respect for Islam’, and restoring
              ‘the past glory of the Islamic civilisation’ (Bernama 2003a,b). Mahatir made this
              one of the driving forces of Malaysian foreign policy. He argued that

                 We can no longer stay disunited if we do not want to fall one by one. Muslims
                 must acquire information, knowledge and technology and keep abreast with
                 developments in the  Western world. Malaysia strongly believes that with
                 financial wealth and natural resources at our disposal, Muslim countries can
                 become strong if we manage our internal affairs well.
                                                        (New Straits Times 2003d)

              The government’s vision for a peaceful and prosperous future is also heavily
              based on maintaining national unity within Malaysia itself (Bernama 2002a).
              Developments which threaten this harmony are strongly criticized. For example,
              the letters section of  The Sun, which is the largest Chinese daily newspaper,
              carried a letter which argued strongly against voting for PAS during the 2004
              elections because of the perceived threat which the introduction of Sharia law
              posed to national harmony (The Sun 2004). Whilst the Chinese and Indian com-
              munities readily buy into this vision, the problem for the government lies with
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52