Page 96 - Conflict, Terrorism, and the Media In Asia
P. 96

Gujarat 2002 and the Indian news media 85

            ●  ‘Kar sevaks’ Literally, this means religious workers. The term has been
               widely used for the thousands of supporters who volunteer to help in the con-
               struction of a temple to the Hindu god, Lord Ram, at Ayodhya in North India.
               The ‘kar sevaks’ were accused of demolishing the Babri mosque at Ayodhya
               on 6 December 1992, which set off a rash of Hindu–Muslim clashes in India.


            Hindutva and Gujarat
            Gujarat is better known as the birthplace of Gandhi, the apostle of peace. But
            here, Hindu–Muslim clashes have been endemic – the state has the worst record
            of Hindu–Muslim clashes in the country since India’s independence in 1947
            (Varshney 2002: 97–98). Three Gujarat towns have been particularly prone to
            Hindu–Muslim clashes:  Ahmedabad,  Vadodara and Godhra. Since the early
            1980s, the state has been one of the major areas where Hindutva forces have
            focused their attention. Political adversaries of the ‘sangh parivar’ allege that such
            forces have treated Gujarat as a ‘Hindutva laboratory’ to conduct political, social
            and cultural experiments in order to replicate them in other parts of India.
              As Shah (1998: 244) observed,

               The Sangh Parivar has disseminated Hindutva ideology in Gujarat over many
               decades. The party (BJP) and its allies have built the organization brick by
               brick. It began to reap the benefits of these endeavours in the early 1990s and
               captured power in 1995.

            After the BJP won an overwhelming majority in the state elections in December
            2002, months after the pogrom against Muslims, there was much speculation in
            the media that the BJP would adopt the ‘Gujarat formula’ to win power in other
            states in the country.
              Over the years, Gujarat has been turned into a Hindutva powerhouse that the BJP
            and the ‘sangh parivar’ often tap into for human and material resources for activi-
            ties in other parts of India. Gujarat is one of India’s most prosperous states; people
            of the state are known for their business acumen and spirit of enterprise. The factor
            of ‘long distance nationalism’ also plays a role, with prosperous Gujaratis in
            Britain, the US and elsewhere generously contributing funds to organizations of the
            ‘sangh parivar’. It is also a fact that in several cities in Gujarat, Hindus and Muslims
            are linked together in trade relations, bound by economic compulsions and the
            Gujarati language and culture. Hindutva supporters from Gujarat have been in the
            forefront of the BJP’s political mobilization. From the late 1980s onwards, the BJP
            openly joined other organizations of the ‘sangh parivar’ such as the VHP and the
            Bajrang Dal to create a national mood for the construction of a temple in honour of
            Lord Ram at Ayodhya, at precisely the same spot where the Babri mosque stood.
              Ayodhya has a prominent place in the myths and mists of Hinduism, mainly in
            the ancient religious text, the Ramayana. The ‘sangh parivar’s argument has been
            that a Ram temple had existed at the very spot on which the Mughal emperor Babur
            built the Babri mosque in the sixteenth century to humiliate the Hindus and that the
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101