Page 111 - Confronting Race Women and Indians on the Frontier, 1815 - 1915
P. 111

F R  O  N  T  I E R    PROCESS:  VI L  I F YI N  G

                                             t
                   o
                           o
                                                     o
              body  f  riders  n   a distant hill, only  o   learn  n   approaching them that
              they were T e xas Rangers. 38
                  In this state of constant agitation, male and f e male migrants blamed
              American  Indians  f o r  any  misfortune  or  irregularity  that  occurred.
              Indians automatically became the villain of virtually any mishap. Because
              prejudice and near hysteria achieved dimensions that defied rationality
              and reason, natives did not even need to be in the area, nor was it nec­
              essary f o r any shred of evidence to exist to suggest that they had per­
              petrated an incident; they were immediately and irrevocably indicted.
              When cattle stampeded, Mary  a rner indicated that the guards assumed
                                        W
              that  Indians  had  been  the  cause.39  Katherine  Dunlap  explained  that
              when stock wandered it was "natural" to think that it had been stolen
              by  Indians,  who  were  assumed  to  be  always  "skulking  around  the
              camps."40 When observing Native Americans  f o r her first time, Lucy
              Sexton noted that "they  were  mounted,  and  one  of them  on  a  fine
              American  horse, undoubtedly  stolen."41 And Emily  Horton  offered a
              particularly harsh judgment when some of the men of her train brought
              a  bleached  skull into  camp. According  to  her, it was "all  there was to
              show that one of our race had perished f a r f r om home. No doubt death
              was  caused by savages."42
                  When real Indians were spotted, ensuing accounts led to great pre­
              cautions. Despite their demeanor or intentions, natives were blamed f o r
              all kinds  of deeds. One man  rushed into  camp  hollering that Indians
              were chasing him. He raised fifteen to twenty armed men, only to dis­
              cover on tracking down the natives that they wanted "to smoke peace"
              and beg f o r f o od. These same men remained convinced that a f u ll-scale
              attack would hit their camp that very night. Despite their f e ars, it failed
              to  materialize.43  In  another instance, the mere presence  of American
              Indians in the vicinity caused train members  to  dress and prepare fo r
              night combat. On the next day an oxen, "full of arrows, but still alive,"
              was f o und on the trail. After shooting the animal to end its misery, these
              people  concluded  that  some  other  train  moving ahead  of them  had
              been struck.44
                  This is not to argue that there were no violent and tragic interac­
              tions  between  fr ontier  people  and  Native  Americans, f o r  there  were
              many  such  unfortunate  instances. Rather, the  suggestion  here  is  that



                                           1 0 3
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116