Page 81 - Confronting Race Women and Indians on the Frontier, 1815 - 1915
P. 81

F  R  O  N  T  I E R    P  H  I L OSOP HY:  EUROPEAN  DISCOURSE


              domestic labors they were usually complimentary in tone. Although an
              occasional visitor depicted "wives of settlers" as living in "sloth and inac­
              tivity,"  others  were  delighted to learn that all women were not as lazy
              as rumored.82  Still  others represented western women  as very diligent
              indeed. According to Sealsfield, a f a rm wife was "in motion fr om morn­
              ing till evening." 83 The Englishman William Blane was even more lauda­
              tory. In his view, women in the backwoods of the 1820S were "the most
              industrious fe males" he had ever seen in any country.84
                  Even  though  fr ontierswomen  labored  assiduously  within  their
              homes, they reportedly never worked in the fields. Travelers consistently
              characterized fr ontierswomen  as  hard  workers  in  the  home  but  pro­
              tected  fr om  "unwomanly  employment"  in  the  fields.8s  In  1841,  an
              Englishman  emphasized  that "every man  here, rich  or poor, seems  on
              all  occasions sedulously to  give  place  and precedence to  f e males, and
              the  meanest  of them are  exempt, or I might rather say  debarred, fr om
              those  masculine  or  laborious  tasks  which  are  commonly  enough
                                                             ,,
              assigned the sex, or assumed by  them, in our country. 86 And in  1860,
              a Swede wrote home that "women never work in the fields-not even
                          ,,
              milking cows. 87
                  Europeans identified  a variety  of reasons  fo r this  practice, which
              was very strange to Europeans who were  used  to women working in
              the fields. Many speculated that the generally high regard paid western
              women explained the situation. At least one writer suggested, however,
              that the inordinate cost of imported British goods caused women to be
                                                                ,,
              "chiefly employed in making articles of domestic clothing. 88 Generally,
              observers  assumed  that  the restriction  of f r ontierswomen  to  domestic
              labor meant a relatively easy life f o r them. They often characterized set­
              tlers' wives  and daughters as "ladies" who  refused to  draw  their own
              water fr om a well.89  In  1848, a Swedish f a rmer in Illinois wrote  home
              that "women do not have to do any other work here but wash clothes
              and  cups  and keep  the  house  tidied up  and at some places  also  cook
              f o od."9 0  A Frenchman traveling in Kansas during the  8 70S claimed that
                                                            1
              "an American woman's only job is to make a home  and to make little
              Americans; we were never able  to make the women there understand
              that country women in France work on the land and know how to do
              it almost as well as their husbands."91



                                            73
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86