Page 177 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 177

NOTES

               sexual subject, cf. M.Foucault, The history of sexuality, tr. R.Hurley (New York,
               Random House, 1978); M.Foucault, The use of pleasure, tr. R.Hurley (New
               York, Pantheon Books, 1985); M. Foucault, The case of the self, tr. R.Hurley
               (New York, Pantheon Books, 1986).
            48. Foucault, Power/knowledge, p. 39.
            49. Ibid., p. 119.
            50. P.Anderson, In the tracks of historical materialism: the Wettek Library lectures
               (London, Verso, 1983), p. 54.
            51. Foucault, Power/knowledge, p. 117.
            52. Ibid., p. 126.
            53. Ibid., p. 130.
            54. J.Culler, Structuralist poetics: structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature
               (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1975).
            55. G.Hartman (ed.), Deconstruction and criticism (New York, Seabury Press, 1979).
            56. A.Easthope, British post-structuralism since 1968 (London, Routledge, 1988),
               pp. 21–2, 161–4.
            57. Ibid., p. 210.
            58. T.Hawkes, Structuralism and semiotics (London, Methuen, 1977).
            59. T.Hawkes, That Shakespeherian rag: essays on critical process (London,
               Methuen, 1986); T. Hawkes, Meaning by Shakespeare (London, Routledge,
               1992).
            60. J.Fiske, Introduction to communication studies (London, Methuen, 1982); J.Fiske,
               Reading the popular (London, Unwin Hyman, 1989); J.Fiske, Understanding
               Popular Culture (London, Unwin Hyman, 1989).
            61. P.Widdowson, The crisis in English studies, in Re-reading English, ed. P.Widdowson
               (London, Methuen, 1982).
            62. A.Easthope, Literary into cultural studies (London, Routledge, 1991), p. 11.
            63. S.Hall, Cultural studies and the Centre: some problematics and problems, in
               Culture, media, language, eds. S.Hall et al. (London, Hutchinson/Centre for
               Contemporary Cultural Studies, 1980), p. 35.
            64. S.Hall, Encoding/decoding, in Culture, media, language eds. Hall et al.
            65. S.Hall, Cultural studies: two paradigms, Media, culture and society, 2, 1,
               1980.
            66. S.Hall, The toad in the garden: Thatcherism among the theorists, in Marxism
               and the interpretation of culture, eds. C.Nelson & L.Grossberg (London,
               Macmillan, 1988), p. 56.
            67. Ibid., pp. 51–3.
            68. Easthope, British post-structuralism, p. 153.
            69. Ibid.
            70. H.Felperin, Beyond deconstruction: the uses and abuses of literary theory (Oxford,
               Oxford University Press, 1985), pp. 71–2.
            71. F.Lentricchia, After the new criticism (Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
               1980).
            72. Easthope, British post-structuralism, pp. 134–5.
            73. C.MacCabe, Theoretical essays: film, linguistics, literature (Manchester,
               Manchester University Press, 1985), pp. 33–57; S.Heath, Questions of cinema
               (London, Macmillan, 1981), pp. 19–75.
            74. F.Barker, The tremulous private body: essays on subjection (London, Methuen,
               1984).
            75. C.Belsey, The subject of tragedy: identity and difference in Renaissance drama
               (London, Methuen, 1985).
            76. J.Dollimore, Introduction: Shakespeare, cultural materialism and the new


                                       168
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182