Page 182 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 182

NOTES

            53. J.Lacan, The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis, tr. A.Sheridan (London,
               Hogarth Press, 1977), p. 20.
            54. cf. Moi, T. (ed.), (1986), The Kristeva reader (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
            55. E.P.Thompson, The poverty of theory and other essays (London, Merlin Press,
               1978), p. 405.
            56. J.Kristeva, Revolution in poetic language, tr. M.Waller (New York, Columbia
               University Press, 1984), p. 26.
            57. Ibid., pp. 82–5.
            58. Cixous and Clément, The newly born woman, p. 84.
            59. Cixous, Laugh of the Medusa, p. 250.
            60. Showalter, Feminist criticism in the wilderness, p. 255.
            61. Mitchell, Women: the longest revolution, p. 292.
            62. J.Wolff, Feminine sentences: essays on women and culture (Cambridge, Polity
               Press, 1990), pp. 33–47.
            63. G.Pollock, Vision and difference: femininity, feminism and histories of art (London,
               Routledge, 1988), p. 54.
            64. Mitchell, Women: The longest revolution, p. 291.
            65. Ibid., p. 294.
            66. Showalter, A criticism of our own, p. 369. To be fair, we should note that the
               “Feminist Criticism in the Wilderness” essay was first published as early as 1981,
               that is, well before the New Right backlash gathered its full momentum. But
               Showalter chose to republish it unamended as late as 1985 in a book she herself
               edited.
            67. Showalter, A criticism of our own, p. 359.
            68. G.C.Spivak, In other worlds: essays in cultural politics (London, Methuen, 1987);
               B. Johnson, A world of difference (Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University
               Press, 1987).
            69. M.Barrett, Women’s oppression today: the Marxist/feminist encounter (London,
               Verso, 1988), p. xxix.
            70. C.Weedon, Feminist practice and post-structuralist theory (Oxford, Basil Blackwell,
               1987).
            71. Editorial, Feminist Review, 23, 1986, p. 4.
            72. M.Barrett, Feminism’s turn to culture, Woman: A Cultural Review, 1, 1990.
            73. T.de Lauretis, Alice doesn’t: feminism, semiotics, cinema (London, Macmillan,
               1984); L. Mulvey, Afterthoughts on “visual pleasure and narrative cinema” inspired
               by Duel in the Sun, in Popular fiction: technology, ideology, production, reading,
               ed. T.Bennett (London, Routledge, 1990).
            74. E.Gross, Conclusion: What is feminist theory?, in Feminist challenges: social
               and political theory eds. C.Pateman and E.Gross (Boston, Northeastern University
               Press, 1986), pp. 190–3.
            75. Ibid., p. 204.
            76. E.Grosz, Sexual subversions: three french feminists (Sydney, Allen & Unwin,
               1989), p. 234.
            77. Showalter, A criticism of our own, p. 369.
            78. M.Barrett, Words and things: materialism and method in contemporary feminist
               analysis, in Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates, eds. M.Barrett
               & A.Phillips (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992), p. 208.
            79. Y.Tasker, Having it all: feminism and the pleasures of the popular, in Off centre:
               feminism and cultural studies, eds. S.Franklin et al. (London, HarperCollins
               Academic, 1991), p. 96.
            80. Ibid.
            81. L.Kipnis, Feminism: the political conscience of postmodernism?, in Universal


                                       173
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187