Page 22 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 22

UTILITARIAN CULTURE AND CAPITALIST CIVILIZATION

            recognition, or so Parsons argued, of the significance for social science
            of “the conception of a common system of ultimate values as a vital
            element in concrete social life”. 36
              It is precisely such systems of ultimate value, according to Parsons,
            which organize, integrate and de-randomize the ends of particular
            individual actors, and which also shape the normative orientations
            through which the analytically separate elements in the unit act are
            structurally related to each other. This stress on “ultimate values” is
            characteristically “cultural”, though it is not, in fact, as characteristically
            sociological as Parsons himself supposed. Parsons’s own sense of the
            importance of truly common values is almost certainly open to at
                                                                 37
            least as much criticism as the initial utilitarian conception itself.  But
            Parsons is nonetheless quite right to identify a fundamental incapacity
            on the part of utilitarian thinkers to understand the significance for
            action of human values, whether religious, political, ethical or aesthetic.
            Neither Benthamite indifference nor the Humean subterfuge by which
            evaluative judgements are misrepresented as acts of cognition are at
            all adequate. For the economists, perhaps even the political scientists,
            such sins are merely venial. But for the cultural theorist, they become
            irreparably mortal.



                     Utilitarian culture and capitalist civilization

            The enduring appeal of utilitarianism owes a great deal more, however,
            to a happy coincidence between its thematics and those of powerful
            business interests than it does to whatever inherent intellectual power
            it may possess. And this has indeed always been so. As Alvin Gouldner
            observes: “in the eighteenth century, utility emerged as a dominant
            social standard. What is relevant here is utilitarianism not as a technical
            philosophy but as a part of the popular, everyday culture of the middle
            class”.  Already actually dominant in Britain and in its North American
                 38
            colonies during the 18th century, utilitarian values underlay much of
            the rhetoric of the French Revolution, and were rapidly transmitted
            throughout Europe, and thereafter by means of imperialism throughout
            the world, in the 19th and early 20th centuries. And there can be little
            doubt that utilitarianism has indeed provided a powerful rationale
            for the developmental logics of industrial capitalist (and even Soviet
            state capitalist) civilization. But the immense institutional and


                                       13
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27