Page 85 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 85

Chapter 4
                        STRUCTURALISM







            The culturalist tradition shares with the Marxist at least two major
            theoretical presuppositions: first, the analytical postulate of a necessary,
            and quite fundamental, contradiction between cultural value on the
            one hand, and the developmental logic of utilitarian capitalist civilization
            on the other; and secondly, the prescriptive imperative to locate some
            social institution, or social grouping, sufficiently powerful as to sustain
            the former against the latter. Culturalist hopes have been variously
            invested in the state, the church, the literary intelligentsia and the
            labour movement; Marxist aspirations in theory much more uniformly
            in the working class, but in practice also in the state, as for communist
            Marxism, and in the intelligentsia (and very often more especially the
            literary intelligentsia) for Western Marxism. Structuralism accepts
            neither analytical postulate nor prescriptive imperative. For the former,
            it substitutes a dichotomy between appearance and essence, in which
            essence is revealed only in structure; for the latter, a scientistic
            epistemology which typically denies both the need for prescriptive
            practice and the possibility of meaningful group action.
              There are many different versions of structuralism, of course, both
            in general and as applied to literature and culture in particular. But, for
            our purposes, and very broadly, structuralism might well be defined as
            an approach to the study of human culture, centred on the search for
            constraining patterns, or structures, which claims that individual
            phenomena have meaning only by virtue of their relation to other
            phenomena as elements within a systematic structure. More specifically,
            certain kinds of structuralism—those denoted very often by the terms
            semiology and semiotics—can be identified with the much more precise
            claim that the methods of structural linguistics can be successfully
                                                         1
            generalized so as to apply to all aspects of human culture.  Structuralism
            secured entry into British intellectual life initially during the late 1960s
            and the 1970s. But in France—and structuralism has been an


                                       76
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90