Page 227 - Contemporary Political Sociology Globalization Politics and Power
P. 227

Globalization and Democracy 213


                    the Yemeni representative on the UN Security Council voted against the
                    resolution that would have legalized the invasion, the US cancelled its $70
                    million of annual aid to Yemen (Monbiot,  2004 : 78).
                         Of course, in some respects, the problem that democratic procedures
                    do not lead to substantively democratic outcomes is not peculiar to inter-
                    national institutions. On the contrary, backroom dealing, and outright
                    bribery and threats go on everywhere in the lobbying of governments by
                    wealthy interest groups, and policies that work for the benefi t of some
                    often do not work for the good of all. Nevertheless, the differences in
                    state capacities are so great that to make IGOs genuinely democratic
                    would surely require more than institutional reform. If gross social and
                    economic inequalities between  individuals  within states inevitably lead to
                    substantive failures in democracy, even if democratic procedures were
                    developed and adhered to in IGOs, given the immense inequalities between
                    states, much more than institutional reform would seem to be needed. In
                    addition to this problem, moreover, the question of whether the leaders
                    of states, elected on national issues, are able to represent citizens ade-
                    quately in international political institutions exacerbates the  “ democratic
                    defi cit ”  of IGOs. This is especially the case because  –  as we have seen in
                    the European Union  –  voters generally take very little interest in what is
                    still perceived as  “ foreign policy. ”  It is because IGOs are widely perceived
                    as unrepresentative and unjust on all these counts that they have become
                    the targets of different strategies of democratization by the organizations,
                    groups, and individuals organized into social movements that make up
                    global civil society.



                        5.3   Global Civil Society


                        “ Global civil society ”  is a complex and controversial concept. It is intended
                    to be simply descriptive in some respects. John Keane defi nes global civil
                    society as  “ a dynamic non - governmental system of interconnected social -
                      economic institutions that straddle the whole earth, and that have complex
                    effects that are felt in its four corners ”  (Keane,  2003 : 8).  “ Non -
                      governmental ”  includes a huge range and variety of participants, from
                    religious groups, sports clubs, debating societies, academies, and trades
                    unions, through to groups of concerned citizens (Habermas,  1992 : 453).
                    Besides its non - governmental character, what characterizes civil society,
                    above all, is  civility , the peaceful negotiation of shared social meanings.
                    From the point of view of the democratization of globalization, the most
                    important participants in global civil society are individuals, groups, and
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232