Page 54 - Courting the Media Contemporary Perspectives on Media and Law
P. 54

The Man in the Gallery with the Writing on His Face   45


                                 In  fact, for many media commentators, public  attendance at the Inquest
                             was only seen as indicative of one of two attitudes – a Diana fixation which
                             was  a  sublimation  of  unexplored  psychological  deviance,  or  a  conspiracy
                             theory obsession which was similarly illustrative of some kind of disturbance.
                             In this case, audience members witnessing the events to an unhealthy degree
                             become  conspiracy  theorists  seeking  Knight‘s  ‗compensation‘  in  their  own
                             reading of impossibly remote events, and also as figures whose appearance to
                             publicly  claim  such  a  status  was  an  unhealthy  parody  of  the  dignified  but
                             intense public grief surrounding Diana‘s death. Writing in the New Statesman,
                             Ros  Wynne-Jones  characterises  this  deriding  of  the  regulars  alongside  a
                             general ‗anti-inquest‘ attitude amongst opinion formers in public and private
                             life, as a form of defensive apology for the very un-British display of national
                             grief after the death. ‖It is as if the collective shame of that very un-British
                             episode  [the  large-scale  mourning]  is  being  played  out  in  an  anti-inquest
                             sentiment, as the proceedings are vilified by talkshow hosts and belittled by
                             opinion-formers from cab-drivers to Question Time panellists‖[Wynne-Jones].
                             The public whose grief appeared to be so widespread as to disarm cynicism in
                             the immediate aftermath of the accident was not represented in this reading of
                             the figures present. Rather, this wider, more dignified, absent, body was seen
                             as being engaged in a double refusal – firstly to take an interest in an Inquest
                             which should be allowing the dead lovers and their driver to rest in peace and
                             secondly to take an interest in the absurd conspiracy narratives surrounding the
                             event.  The  reading  of  the  social  performances  in  the  environment  of  the
                             courtroom  provided,  in  Loughrey‘s  face-paint,  in  Howsam‘s  placard,  in
                             Witty‘s  giggles,  evidence  that  the  real  ‗conspiracy‘  was  the  creation  and
                             maintenance of a context in which such delusional behaviour might flourish, a
                             conspiracy of conspiracy theorists, obsessive, socially maladroit and seeking
                             to waste the time, energy and money of the state through the connivance of
                             irresponsible  legal  business.  The  social  performance  surrounding  the
                             courtroom became confirmation of the correctness of this particular conspiracy
                             theory  –  that  the  only  figures  who  might  become  caught  up  in  such  events
                             were those whose lives are empty – an insight which echoed with the general
                             media characterisation of Mohammed Al-Fayed himself.


                               CONCLUSION - PERFORMANCE IN THE ROYAL COURTS

                                 My own sense of the reading of the events before Court 73 is that a series
                             of elements of social performance appeared to provide resonant insights into
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59