Page 64 - Courting the Media Contemporary Perspectives on Media and Law
P. 64

The Fate of the Iconic Sign: Taser Video        55


                             these practices assume authority for the camera, and sanction its use, because
                             it  is  believed  to  contribute  factual  truth  to  matters  at  hand  and/or  a  more
                                                                                        3
                             complete sense of presence than is possible through documents alone.
                                 That this could significantly complicate legal decision  making has been
                             observed in discussions of the use of videoconferencing in appearances and
                             arraignments in criminal proceedings, where defense lawyers have to choose
                             whether to join their client in a remote location, making possible consultation,
                             advice, and support, or to remain in the courtroom, where the client may see
                             the  lawyer  as  part  of  the  court  and  not  as  a  personal  advocate,  but  where
                             presence in the court enables the defense lawyer to confer with the judge. The
                             benefits attributed to using videoconferencing in these contexts are savings in
                             time and travel costs and easier management of security. Defendants have the
                             right to refuse to appear or be arraigned in this fashion, although there are no
                             doubt  pressures  toward  accepting  it.  Poor  technological  arrangements  can
                             exacerbate the problems the defendants face. [Fowler] [Sharkey]
                                 When courts use video as part of their regular administrative practices, we
                             have recordings made to accomplish deliberate ends, and while they may be
                             ―edited‖ both through the timing of the start and end of recording or because
                             selections may be made from the video stream (clips from long depositions,
                             for instance), they are not constructed cinematically through the ―grammar of
                             film language‖ [Arijon] to any great degree (though any fragment of video has
                             expressive effects arising from whatever was captured in combination with the
                             circumstances, equipment, social surround and viewer understanding.) While
                             it  is  very  possible  to  criticize  video  used  by  the  legal  system  for  technical
                             inadequacy, poor planning for ancillary or incidental effects that can actually
                             affect the administration of justice (as in camera angle for remote appearances;
                             matching  of  gazes  or  not  in  video-conferencing),  the  circumstances  of  their
                             making bespeak a measure of control over their realization. Someone ordered
                             and  set  up  the  equipment;  presumably  there  are  technical  staff  available  to
                             troubleshoot any problems and there is probably some system of backing up
                             crucial data and archiving it. Or there should be.
                                 Newer  kinds  of  video  that  are  and  will  be  increasingly  at  issue  are
                             recordings made by surveillance cameras and those made by mobile devices,
                             such  as  dashboard  cameras  in  vehicles,  and  hand-held  devices  (made  by

                             3
                               Presence is of increasing importance in legal contexts. Our global economy is creating disputes
                                 across  national  borders,  time  zones,  cultures, and  there  will  be  increasing  debate  around
                                 what is the required presence for trustworthy decision making with the use of technology to
                                 transcend  limitations  on  actual  physical  presence,  adding  not  just  videoconferencing  but
                                 virtual reality environments, avatars, etc.
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69