Page 174 - Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilience
P. 174

Collaboration in Working With Children Affected by Disaster   143

            of feeling. They also felt the developmentally normal wish not to stand out
            in front of their peers as someone who couldn’t handle intense feeling.
            Among the teenagers, some of the boys felt that they were now the man
            of the house, and others had become rebellious and difficult. Many of the
            girls had become more affectionate with their mothers. All the sibling sys-
            tems seemed closer than before. There was a particular difficulty for boys
            who had lost their fathers and for girls who had lost their mothers.
              Children were ambivalent about their single parent getting back into
            life (working, dating, socializing, enjoying recreational activities). They
            wanted this kind of transition to a new level of normalcy, yet they also
            did not want their parent to get back into life (the child feeling jealous
            and resentful of this), feeling that this would betray the dead parent in
            some way.



            Work With the Parents


            In workshops with parents, we spoke about how to handle children’s fears
            concerning bad things happening again and how to reassure when safety
            cannot be guaranteed. We introduced the concept of probable safety and
            of danger that was possible though unlikely as a way to speak with reas-
            surance and honesty with their children. Parents realized the mixed mes-
            sages they were giving their children about safety, such as saying, “You’re
            not allowed to go to school on your bike” (communicating their fear of
            another loss) but also saying, “God wouldn’t do that to me twice.”
              Parents asked about getting help for their children and whether they
            should do it now or wait until the children expressed problems. Several
            had already brought their children and other family members for therapy.
            Parents were often unsure whether to interpret their children’s problematic
            behaviors and attitudes and feelings as reactions to losing their father or
            mother on 9/11 or as reactions to other matters that would have happened
            even without the trauma (such as siblings fighting or a parent going away
            overnight). Parents also had to deal with their children’s resentment of their
            dating or with their children’s longing for a new parent to replace the lost
            one (“I want a new daddy”) when the parent was not yet ready. We were able
            to encourage parents who were avoiding reference to the dead parent to find
            ways to refer to him or her. We explained that they could let their children
            identify with the dead parent and value him or her, telling the child that
            they were like the parent and valuing stories about that parent.
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179