Page 218 - Critical Political Economy of the Media
P. 218

Media power, challenges and alternatives  197

             research on agenda-setting (McCombs 2004) and framing (Entman 2007) as well
             as content (Glasgow Media Group, see Eldridge 1993; Berry and Theobald
             2006: 109–24) and critical discourse analysis (Fairclough 1995). Access power
             concerns whose voices, identities and interests get heard in the public media.
             This includes addressing how particular interests or identities are articulated or
             excluded in the media and how media institutions and systems are structured in
             relation to access to communication. The third type of power is resource power,
             which refers to the ways in which those who own and control the media can
             affect the actions of state authorities.
               In another useful formulation, Street distinguishes between two dimensions of
             media power. The first is power over the media (what gets shown and reported),
             the power of social actors to influence the discursive power of the media. The
             second dimension is the power of the media to shape meanings and effect change
             (what gets changed by the media). As Curran and Couldry (2003: 3) emphasise,
             accounts that focus exclusively on power over the media can treat the media as
             merely ‘the door through which the contestants for power pass en route for
             battle’. Instead, they suggest the media are better understood as a processing
             plant, that converts inputs rather than merely carrying them (like a waterfall
             carries water). The media do not just mediate what lies outside them, they generate.
             If we overemphasise the impact of external power on the media we risk losing sight
             of what happens inside the so-called ‘black box’, how media process and create
             meanings, and crucially too what difference they make in the world. The media
             cannot be viewed merely as a watchdog against other forms of power, they need
             to be scrutinised as central generators of power in contemporary societies.
               My own preferred metaphoric concept for the media is that of apparatus. The
             term apparatus is used in a variety of ways in media studies from production to
             ideology critique (Althusser’s Ideological State Apparatuses). An apparatus
             means both the technical resources required for particular activities or purposes,
             and the complex structure of an organisation or system. An apparatus may be
             used and occupied, but it is also actively shaped and constructed. Crucially, an
             apparatus has affordances (qualities which enable and may also prompt the
             performance of certain actions) but all the possible uses cannot be simply read
             off from structure alone. Apparatuses are constraining frames but also enabling
             of multiple uses and unpredictability. If this serves as a general term, there are
             clearly also variations in the design, complexity and variability of uses, access
             rights and control over apparatuses that CPE explores. Apparatus-as-object is
             vulnerable to Foucault’s important critique that both Marxism and liberalism
             regard power as a possession that is exercised repressively from a centralised
             source. Yet accounts of the diffusion of media power, some influenced by Foucault,
             can end up dissolving power altogether. To pursue the metaphor of apparatus,
             there are indeed apparatuses of communication, institutionalised orderings of
             power, but power arises from relationships with apparatuses, it does not merely
             inhere in apparatuses themselves. Power is produced through interactions
             (instrumental and structural) across various levels or domains of activity in
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223