Page 228 - Critical Political Economy of the Media
P. 228

Media power, challenges and alternatives  207

                 operations; some re-producing hegemony, others clearly counter-hegemonic;
                 some reactionary, some reformist, some revolutionary, and others less
                 obviously political.

             Contrary to the voluntarist notion of independence deployed by Bailey et al.,
             alternative media do not operate entirely outside forces of state and market.
             Many internal and external factors shape the performance and social influence
             of alternative media but CPE gives particular attention to issues of financing and
             resources. Most alternative media involve small-scale production, taking advantage
             of cost-benefits from technology for production and/or distribution (such as
             ‘desk-top publishing’ and video technology in the 1980s). Sources of income
             have included sales (music fanzines for instance) but also subsidies and support.
             There is media produced directly by organisations and subsidised from income
             generated elsewhere or included in costs of membership or services. There is
             media funded wholly or partly by third-parties: grant-funding bodies, civil
             society organisations, trade unions, political parties, states.
               A key issue for contemporary debates is the relationship between technological
             resources and financing: does digitalisation lessen problems of a lack of financial
             resources, and problems of patronage and control by funders? Second, much
             alternative media production has relied heavily on ‘free labour’, individuals
             giving their labour and time. Such altruism is rightly celebrated at the heart of
             Benkler and others’ visions for non-commodified Internet exchange. However,
             that connects to the emergence of more critical readings of free labour as
             exploitation and the limits imposed by capital and states on co-operation (Fuchs
             2011). This links to a third key area for analysis: the distribution of resources for
             alternative media. Entman and Steinman (2008) highlight the pressures that
             draw working people away from contesting dominant power interests. Increasing
             marketisation and the global recession has meant, in much of the West, a
             weakening of the labour movement and socialist parties, shrinking state and non-
             state funding for civil society organisations. In general, the traditional funding
             resources for alternative media have declined. This increases the importance of
             assessing how the affordances of digitalisation affect the capacity to generate
             alternative media.

             Internet and radical media

             One of the most researched exemplars of radical media in recent years has been
             Indymedia. This also serves to highlight some of the strengths and limitations of
             radical media. Indymedia (www.indymedia.org) activist network grew out of a
             collective that produced live information during the ‘Battle of Seattle’ against the
             WTO meeting held there in 1999. By 2004 Indymedia had 142 affiliated sites in
             54 countries, in 2013 it had around 150 (not all active). Indymedia has been a
             celebrated experiment in democratic media as well as ‘globalisation from below’,
             encouraging and empowering people to ‘be the media’, providing a focus for
   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233