Page 56 - Critical Theories of Mass Media
P. 56

JOBNAME: McGraw−TaylorHarris PAGE: 3 SESS: 12 OUTPUT: Wed Oct 10 13:18:15 2007 SUM: 4FC4002E
   /production/mcgraw−hill/booksxml/tayharris/chap02












                                                         Siegfried Kracauer’s mass ornament  41
                             Kracauer is thus a key critical thinker of the then for the way in
                           which he draws out the more negative implications of the destruc-
                           tion of aura and provides insights into the way in which new media
                           technologies have fostered the development of negative social con-
                           sequences. Such negativity is partially acknowledged by Benjamin
                           himself in the concluding lines of his Essay to which this book
                           repeatedly returns, where he describes how: ‘Mankind, which in
                           Homer’s time was an object of contemplation for the Olympian
                           gods, now is one for itself. Its self-alienation has reached such a
                           degree that it can experience its own destruction as an aesthetic
                           pleasure of the first order’ (Essay: Epilogue). Implicit in Benjamin’s
                           Essay, but more explicitly developed by Kracauer and authors in
                           subsequent chapters of this book, is a particularly disturbing feature
                           of the alienation created by the media. In an iterative fashion,
                           alienation itself risks becoming fodder for the yet further alienating
                           processes of a society for which disintegration and destruction are
                           reduced to the status of aesthetic pleasure – the content of yet more
                           media representations. In Kracauer’s description of shoppers, the
                           analysis is limited to the physical act of consumption in a modern
                           urban environment but it nevertheless manages to recognize the
                           seeds of a process that has led to the media-saturated hyperreal of
                           global capitalism (the focus of Part 2).
                             Like Benjamin, Kracauer saw a complex interrelationship existing
                           between the modern urban environment and media technologies.
                           He saw a symbiosis between the masses as a social concept and the
                                                                                      2
                           technologies of reproduction that facilitate their existence . But
                           unlike Benjamin’s image of an adventurous wanderer walking in the
                           debris of exploded traditional cultural forms, Kracauer also empha-
                           sizes the potentially negative changes wrought upon the social
                           landscape by media technologies. Accordingly, his account of the
                           effects of the newly mediatized urban environment consists of a
                           significantly more downbeat notion of distraction than that found in
                           Benjamin’s Essay:
                             In the centers of night life the illumination is so harsh that one
                             has to hold one’s hands over one’s ears. Meanwhile the lights
                             have gathered for their own pleasure, instead of shining for
                             man. Their glowing traces want to illuminate the night but
                             succeed only in chasing it away. Their advertisements sink into
                             the mind without allowing one to decipher them. The reddish
                             gleam that lingers settles like a cloak over one’s thoughts.
                                                                      (Kracauer 1995: 43)
                           Both the prescience of Kracauer’s analysis and an example of the
                           vastly different conclusions to be drawn from similar descriptions of
                           mediated culture (the difference between critical theory and cultural
                           populism) can be judged by the marked similarity between his above








                                   Kerrypress Ltd – Typeset in XML A Division: chap02 F Sequential 3


                    www.kerrypress.co.uk - 01582 451331 - www.xpp-web-services.co.uk
                    McGraw Hill - 152mm x 229mm - Fonts: New Baskerville
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61