Page 71 - Critical and Cultural Theory
P. 71

LANGUAGE AND INTERPRETATION
    parallel  in  the  work  of  the  major  exponents  of  Reception  Theory.
    This  refers  to  the  critical school  which emerged  in  1964 in  associa-
    tion  with  the  University  of  Konstanz.  Hans-Georg  Gadamer,  in
    particular,  asserts  that  the literary work  never  pops  into  the  world
    as  a  finished  and  neatly  packaged  parcel  of  meaning,  since
    meaning  depends  on  the historical situation  of the  interpreter.  For
    Gadamer,  understanding  a  text  or  event  involves  a  process  of
    ongoing  mediation  between  the  present  and  the  past.  The  inter-
    preter  is  always  historically  situated  and  her/his  present  context
    therefore  determines  how  s/he  understands  texts  and  events.  At
    the  same  time, the  interpreter's present  context  also  affects  her/his
    attitudes  to  the  past.  Readings  of  the  past  depend  on  particular
    assessments  of history in the  present.  Simultaneously, our  grasp of
    our  present  circumstances  is  influenced  by  what  we  make  of  the
    past.  The  temporal  dimension  is  also  emphasized  by  H.  R.  Jauss,
    who  argues  that  a  text  is  received  against  a  collective  horizon  of
    expectations:  an  accepted  set  of cultural values that  define  what  a
    text  may  be predicted  to communicate within a  particular  commu-
    nity  at  a  particular  time.  The  more  radically  a  text  departs  from
    the  horizon  against  which  it  appears,  the  more  innovative  it  is.
    The  impact  of  the  ideas  we  formulate  and  the  ways  in  which  we
    express  them  is  inseparable  from  the  historical  contexts  in  which
    they  occur.
      In  the  domain  of  science,  this point  has  been  sustained  by  T.  S.
    Kuhn  whose  The  Structure  of  Scientific  Revolutions  (1962) divides
    the  history  of  science  into  two  categories:  periods  characterized  by
    uniform  development  within an  accepted  paradigm  and  periods  of
    drastic  change  in  which  the  dominant  set  of  concepts  is  displaced
    and  a  new  paradigm  is  introduced.  The  replacement  of  one
    paradigm  by  another  is  not  dictated  by  logical  and  predictable
    criteria.  No  obvious  evolutionary  trajectory  can  be  traced  in
    paradigm  shifts.  A  new  paradigm  is  adopted  when  a  community
    of  people  working  in  a certain  area  (e.g.  science)  finds  it  necessary
    to  formulate  new  ways  of  dealing  with  the  data  under  investiga-
    tion.  Relatedly,  a  fact  in  science  depends  on  the frame  of reference
    which  the observer  brings to  bear  on  the  object.
      Theories  of  reading  have  also  been  influenced  by  Gestalt
    psychology,  according  to  which the human  mind  does  not  perceive
    things  as  discrete  elements  but  rather  as  configurations,  or  orga-
    nized  patterns.  In  interpreting  a  text,  the  reader  looks  for  such

                                 54
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76