Page 174 - Cultural Competence in Health Education
P. 174

152  Cultural Competence in Health Education and Health Promotion




                         requirements in medical experimentation. These two cases will be further  discussed later
                       in this section.
                           Miscommunication between two countries of different ethnicity and cultural
                        understandings can bring about a war. As Moroccan philosopher Mahdi Elmandjra
                       (2003) has said, in discussing the prevention of such cultural conflicts or clashes of

                       value systems that result in war:  “ We need people to communicate, to respect each oth-
                       er ’ s systems and cultural diversity. The international community has no choice but to
                       survive together ”  (p. 1). When a nation goes to war, the majority of its people label the
                       people of the other nation with a single title. For example, prior to September 11, 2001,
                       Muslims were not considered terrorists by a majority of Americans. However, since
                       9/11, a majority of Americans have stereotyped Muslims into the category of terrorist.
                       It is a fact that the planners of the 9/11 catastrophe did inflict unprecedented damage to

                       the people of the United States; however, not everybody in Afghanistan plotted to at-
                       tack America. Other people ’ s cultures need to be viewed both as wholes and as made
                       of their own diverse parts, and also realistically, not stereotypically. And they need to
                       be taken into consideration in order to bring about peace on Earth. Without this, we
                       will simply be enclosed by our own borders and become our own prisoners.
                            A past event that has shaped the way many American Indians feel toward U.S. health
                       care today is the sterilization of twelve thousand Indian women over the four - year period
                       from 1972 to 1976. England (n.d.) provides an in - depth investigation of the moral issues
                       created by the Indian Health Service (IHS) when it falsely informed Indian women about
                       sterilization procedures. These Indian women were coerced and harassed into having the
                       surgery and were not provided proper information beforehand. Among the things these
                       women were told were that they were bad mothers and their existing children would
                       be taken away from them if they did not consent, that they had enough  children and it
                       was time to stop having children, and that they could still have children after the opera-
                       tion. The atrocities committed by physicians on these women were inexplicable and
                         embarrassing for our nation. The lies told to these women have given many Indians a
                       historical perspective that warns them to mistrust U.S. health care, and they are likely to
                       continue to carry this perspective with them for many years to come. Prior to this event,
                                                            ,
                       which  Indians have referred to as  “ genocide ”  there were no laws concerning punish-
                       ment for those involved in coercive sterilization. However, in 1979, the National Coun-
                       cil of Churches condemned the policy of nonmedical sterilization and asked for a full
                        investigation into the IHS parent agency, then called the Department of Health, Educa-
                       tion, and Welfare, to find all the people responsible for this act and to determine the

                         extent to which the IHS had integrated these actions (England, n.d.).
                           Another historical episode that has led to mistrust in physicians is the Tuskegee
                       Syphilis Study. Conducted from 1932 to 1972 in Tuskegee, Alabama, this clinical study
                       took advantage of 399 poor, illiterate African Americans (CDC, 2005). The researchers
                       told the men who were infected with syphilis that they had  “ bad blood ”  and would
                         receive free treatment, transportation, a hot meal, and $50 for a funeral if they were to
                       die. They were not informed of their diagnosis, only told they had  “ bad blood. ”  In real-
                       ity, the researchers did not provide them with appropriate treatment, such as penicillin,








                                                                                                  7/1/08   2:55:22 PM
          c08.indd   152                                                                          7/1/08   2:55:22 PM
          c08.indd   152
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179