Page 145 - Cultural Studies A Practical Introduction
P. 145

Media Studies                     129

                  Israeli Army in a war crime is given, but it is qualified by information such


                  as the mention of the Hamas fighters that makes the Israeli bombing seem
                  a defensive action.
                      In another  New York Times  news account, the Palestinian defenders are
                  more explicitly characterized negatively. They dress in civilian clothes, and

                  they engage in trickery rather than fighting in the open. Gaza, it reports,
                  has been turned into

                      a deadly maze of tunnels, booby traps and sophisticated roadside bombs.
                    Weapons are hidden in mosques, schoolyards and civilian houses, and the
                  Text not available in the electronic edition
                    leadership ’ s war room is a bunker beneath Gaza ’ s largest hospital, Israeli

                    intelligence officials say. Unwilling to take Israel ’ s bait and come into the

                    open, Hamas militants are fighting in civilian clothes; even the police have
                                                   5
                    been ordered to take off their uniforms.
                   Implicit in this description is the assumption that if the Palestinians use
                  civilian locations such as schoolyards and hospitals to conduct their mili-

                  tary efforts, then the Israelis are justified in attacking such sites. Notice that
                  much of the information presented as fact is a report by Israeli intelligence,
                  but one does not learn this fact until the end of a long sentence laying out
                  Israeli intelligence assertions as facts, so that the facts are not presented as
                  being a skewed report by the invaders designed to justify the invasion.
                  Sometimes the placement of a phrase such as  “ according to Israeli intelli-
                  gence ”  can make all the difference. Placed at the beginning of a report, it
                  frames it as opinion, but placed at the end, it is a qualifier to material

                  presented already as fact. The  New York Times  did not take the trouble to

                  talk to Hamas and to find out what their intelligence service was saying
                  about the Israeli invasion.
                     The reporting by the  Times  was at times even more polemical. In this
                  account, the school attack is explicitly justifi ed:


                      Your unit, on the edges of the northern Gaza town of Jabaliya, has taken

                    mortar fire from the crowded refugee camp nearby. You prepare to return
                    fire, and perhaps you notice  –  or perhaps you don ’ t, even though it ’ s on your

                    map  –  that there is a United Nations school just there, full of displaced
                  Text not available in the electronic edition
                    Gazans. You know that international law allows you to protect your soldiers
                    and return fire, but also demands that you ensure that there is no excessive

                    harm to civilians. Do you remember all that in the chaos? You pick GPS -
                     guided mortars, which are supposed to be accurate and of a specifi c explosive


                    force, and fire back. In the end, you kill some Hamas fighters but also,









                                                                                 1/21/2010   11:08:50 AM
          c10.indd   129
          c10.indd   129                                                         1/21/2010   11:08:50 AM
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150