Page 14 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 14

8 CULTURAL STUDIES

              do,  you  go,  you  should  go  in  to  the  work  knowing  that’s  what,  y’know,
              that’s what your parameters are.
            To  be  marginalized  is  to  have  parameters  binding  your  actions;  it  is  to  be
            constrained.  A  tape-slide  worker  said  how  recent  funding  cutbacks  have
            ‘cramped  our  style  really’,  and  that  ‘things  have  been  tightening’.  And  the
            largeness of power makes the marginalized feel small. As other community arts
            workers said, ‘we’re only small fry’, ‘a little fish’. The spatiality of power, then,
            feels  to  community  arts  workers  as  if  it  limits  and  reduces  the  actions  of  the
            marginalized.
              Community arts workers in Edinburgh therefore see power as instrumental and
            as producing a simply structured spatiality, which makes the central part of the
            city huge and bulging and the margins of the city small and squashed down. This
            distended  spatiality  is  understood  as  constantly  reproduced  by  the  actions  of
            power. It is thus analysed as a space constantly in process, ‘a play of economic
            and technical forces that no politics today subjects to any end other than that of
            its own expansion’ (Nancy, 1991:xxxvii).


                          The space of the margnalized `community'
            Community arts workers in Edinburgh place the ‘communities’ with which they
            work within this spatiality of power; and when they locate a ‘community’ in this
            spatiality, they are able to describe the profound costs of such marginalization.
            This  description  has  a  discursive  effect  which  could  be  interpreted  as  the
            invocation of ‘community’ as a general, coherent and inclusive category; as an
            essentialized  category  which  evades  some  tricky  questions  about  possible
            contests  and  coalitions  between  different  ‘communities’.  However,  I  want  to
            question that interpretation and to suggest that the naming of a ‘community’ as
            marginal in this spatiality of power can be a radical tactic too.
              One  of  the  ways  in  which  community  arts  workers  most  commonly  use  the
            term  ‘community’,  then,  is  to  position  those  marginalized  by  the  actions  of
            power. A ‘community’ is often evoked in contrast to one of those actions. The
            Craigmillar arts worker, for example, used the term ‘community’ in opposition to
            the economic geography of the District Council and the International Festival:
              I think we need to look at [Edinburgh District Council] as well, and say that
              their funding to the Edinburgh International Festival and so on is big, and
              maybe, maybe they could look at that. Of course the reasons they’ll come
              up  with  is  that  y’know  Edinburgh  needs  the  money  that  tourism  through
              the Festival bring in, and that’s beneficial, but I wonder about it, I mean
              the council, where does the council get its finance from. Surely then maybe
              it should be a much more local focus of the council, I mean if the council’s
              there to serve the community, and that’s there, that is what it’s there to do.
              I don’t know what, I don’t know maybe they are bringing in money from
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19