Page 160 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 160

154 CULTURAL STUDIES

            ‘power relations’ or ‘men’s voyeuristic and dominating desires to see, to know,
            and to possess’ the critical import of his work has obviously been almost entirely
            lost.
              Morton sees Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (‘with its patriarchal, racist and capitalist
            constructions’) as an oppressive work so that Madonna’s Express Yourself song
            and  video  can  be  shown  to  deconstruct  it  point  by  point.  Strangely,  given  her
            interpretation of Madonna’s representations as ironic exposure, Morton seems to
            think that because Metropolis depicts certain things it must be arguing for their
            truth. Because it represents factory drones the film ‘claims that the workers do
            not have any minds’ (p. 218). By contrast the fact that the word ‘self’ in Express
            Yourself is sung in a number of different keys is no coincidence. It is all part of
            Madonna’s ‘mediations on the constitution of a decentred subjectivity…the word
            as  well  as  the  concept  gets  divided  and  put  in  motion,  articulating  agency
            through positions that remain partial and temporary’ (p. 228) (who was supposed
            to be trapped in a purely academic introspection again?).
              In interpretations like this the radical potential of a critique of representational
            categories is contained and neutralized as representation. Nothing is what it seems,
            even  the  critique  of  representation  itself  is  already  representation,  already  a
            display  originating  elsewhere  designed  to  ‘reference’  something  else.
            Everywhere  the  celebration  of  a  collapse  of  depth  and  surface,  reality  and
            artifice,  but  only  as  they  are  firmly  trapped  inside  the  receding  depths  of
            Madonna’s  intentional  representations.  In  this  context  the  most  innocent
            declarations  of  liberal  egalitarianism  become  poststructuralist  manifestos.
            Singing ‘it makes no difference if you’re black or white, if you’re a boy or a girl’
            is  not  ‘liberal  catharsis’  but  the  articulation  of  a  ‘postidentity space’  (p.  96).
            Surely that is ironic!… Or am I missing something here, maybe I just don’t get
            it, maybe this whole book is a playful masquerade, etc., etc.


                                        References

            Baudrillard, J. (1993) Baudrillard Live, London: Routledge.
            Foucault, M. (1989) Foucault Live, New York: Semiotext(e).
            Gane, M. (1991) Baudrillard: Critical and Fatal Theory, London: Routledge.
            Morris, M. (1988) ‘Banality in Cultural Studies’, Discourse 2 (Spring/Summer): 2–29.
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165