Page 165 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 165

The Jewish Question and the limits of (post)modern inclusionism
                                        Adam Katz
            ■ Ammiel Alcalay, After Jews and Arabs: Remaking Levantine Culture
            (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993) 288pp. ISBN 0-8166-2154-1,
            $16.95 Pbk■ Jonathan Boyarin, Storm from Paradise: The Politics of Jewish
            Memory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992) 192pp. ISBN
            0-8166-2094-4, $14.95 Pbk ■ Marc H.Ellis, Beyond Innocence and Redemption:
            Confronting the Holocaust and Israeli Power (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1990)
            214pp. ISBN 0-06-062215-6, $21.95 Hbk ■ Michael Learner, The Socialism of
            Fools: Anti-Semitism on the Left (Oakland: Tikkun Books, 1992) 147pp. ISBN
            0-935933-05-0, $10.00 Hbk
            Just as Marx’s ‘On the Jewish Question’ addressed the question of Jewish demands
            for civil rights in terms of the contradictions of political emancipation within
            bourgeois civil society in order to place the question of social emancipation on the
            agenda, it is similarly necessary today to address the Jewish demand for entrance
            into the new (post)liberal middle-class political practices of identity politics, post-
            modernism and cultural studies as a way of advancing a critique of the present-
            day status of civil society and social emancipation. Postmodern cultural theory
            invariably formulates the question of civil society in terms of a conflict between a
            monolithic technocratic mass-mediated public sphere and a series of marginalized
            identities or counter-publics struggling to pluralize the public sphere and transform
            it into a site where differences can be articulated and negotiated (see Fraser, 1990).
            However, this blocks the needed intervention into the global reconstruction of
            capitalist hegemony, which is currently enabled by precisely such a pluralization
            of the mainstream and the opening up of new sub-discourses and identities. That
            is, the ruling class now allows for a degree of cultural autonomy which stands in
            direct proportion to the amount of economic autonomy it expropriates from
            exploited classes. This in turn compels the middle class or new petit-bourgeoisie
            to compete for the available positions in this new mode of social reproduction.
              When Michael Lerner, in his The Socialism of Fools: Anti-Semitism on the
            Left,  argues that Jews have been prominent in demanding that ‘cultural and
            intellectual institutions open their doors to reflect the diversity of intellectual and
            cultural traditions that had previously been ignored’ (p. 122), but have ‘rarely
            demanded that Jewish culture and Jewish history be included in the newly
            emerging diversity’ (p. 122), he is pointing to a contradiction in liberal and left
            Jewish practices between a ‘modern’ support for universalist goals (anti-racism,
            intellectual choice, etc.) and the modes of particularism through which such
            demands are currently articulated and which depend upon a rejection of this
            modern modality. He is, that is, advancing a demand for the ‘emancipation’ of
            Jewish intellectuals and progressives from outmoded liberal/modern positions
            which hinder their ability to participate in the new postmodern power/knowledge
            regime of the West. It is precisely the contradictory character of such a demand
            for inclusion which can allow for a critique of the politics of inclusion itself.
   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170