Page 182 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 182

176 CULTURAL STUDIES

            course,  is  that  such  psychotic  consumption-at-all-cost  is  precisely  the  kind  of
            deranged energy necessary to launch the culture industry’s would-be superstars
            into the stratospheric sales patterns required to sustain global culture-capitalism.
            One of the many eccentric and oddball quotations cited by Marcus says as much,
            as the authors of Starlust: The Secret Fantasies of Fans quip that: ‘It is hardly
            surprising,  when  stars  offer  themselves  so  lavishly  for  consumption,  that  some
            fans will take the invitation literally.’ The point being, of course, that the various
            steaming  corpses  in  the  voracious  mouths  of  the  consuming  public  have  been
            spoon-fed to them with the tacit approval of the very performers who constitute
            this season’s main course.
              This  is  all  quite  amusing,  as  far  as  ironic  culture  critique  metaphors  go;  the
            essay thus cannot help but remind the reader of the towering sneer of Adorno,
            the  Marcuse  of  One-Dimensional  Man,  deBord’s  theory  of  the  ‘spectacle’,  or
            even,  at  its  most  extreme,  the  rantings  and  ravings  of  late  Baudrillard.  The
            problem, however, with both this entire critical tradition and Marcus’ essay, is
            that  the  dynamics  of  cultural  production  (from  the  artist’s  standpoint)  and
            consumption (from the fan’s standpoint) are much too complex to be reduced to
            the tired old charge of commodity fetishism gone wild. Indeed, there is a world of
            particularity that gets lost beneath the knowing laughter of this approach; while
            the  metaphor  is  unquestionably  hilarious  and  powerfully  indicative  of  the
            insanity that lies at the heart of mass-market rock & roll, it none the less tells us
            nothing of how or why this insanity is produced, how critics and fans can engage
            in popular culture without falling into its trap, or how artists can avoid becoming
            next season’s chosen chow-for-the-masses.


                                   Friday, November 3rd
            We got word by mid-morning that the van would be road-ready by 3:00, so, after
            a morning of re-stringing guitars, xeroxing flyers, making phone calls trying to
            drum-up promo support for next week’s shows, and plowing through a few more
            essays in Present Tense, we were off for the Beat Kitchen. The transmission cost
            us a cool $1,138—which no self-respecting independent rock band in the world
            has  lying  around—so  the  drive  to  Chicago  was  tainted  by  the  paralyzing
            realization that we were now in debt for the rest of the imaginable future not only
            to all of our friends and a handful of lefty arts supporters, but also to one of our
            lead singers’ financially stable sisters. The Beat Kitchen is a wonderful club in
            Chicago,  with  an  excellent  stage,  lights,  and  PA;  the  management  treats
            musicians like human beings (which is rare), and the kitchen actually has a few
            vegetarian choices (which is even more rare), so gigs there are always a treat. We
            shared  the  stage  with  Las  Toallitas,  a  remarkable  band  featuring  two
            percussionists, bass, keys, dueling gypsy/bebop horns, vocals that invariably end
            up  in  Greek  or  Yiddish,  and  an  awesome  xylophone  player.  Our  set  went
            extremely  well,  with  the  band  feeding  off  of  the  crowd’s  dancing  and  in  turn
            cranking things up to a frenzied pitch; we featured mostly songs from our latest
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187