Page 192 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 192

186 CULTURAL STUDIES

              America in the 1990s is at least as complicated as that of anyplace on the
              planet, especially since Euro-America is the place to which much of the rest
              of the world has moved or longs to migrate.
                                                                  (pp. x–xi)


            What binds these books together (above and beyond the fact that they both belong
            to Wesleyan University Press’s new ‘Music/Culture’ series) is that each attempts
            to open up the field of music scholarship—in ways that it generally hasn’t been
            opened up before—to the messy complexities of the circulation and function of
            music on the contemporary cultural terrain.
              Despite their shared commitment to moving beyond reductionist approaches to
            the study of music, however, these two projects remain markedly dissimilar from
            one another: so much so that it is tempting to see them as complementary
            counterparts to each other, with each book providing a piece of the larger puzzle
            that the other, because of its quite different focus, cannot supply. Subcultural
            Sounds,  for instance, is primarily a theory-driven project that operates at a
            relatively abstract level of macro-analysis (even though its formal subject is
            ‘micromusics’), and Slobin is ultimately far more concerned with constructing
            broadly applicable theoretical models 1  of music and culture than he is with
            analyzing particular facets of specific local musics. While Slobin refers to an
            incredibly broad spectrum of musical subcultures at various points throughout the
            book (enough so that one can’t help but be impressed by his fluency with such a
            wide range of musics), these brief dips into the real function primarily as illustrative
            examples supporting the more abstract models that Slobin is trying to build. My
            Music,  on the other hand, is a more empirically oriented project dedicated to
            fleshing out the minute details of a tiny corner of the musical terrain: the various
            ways in which individual members of an urban community (Buffalo, NY) make
            use of music in their daily lives. While the Music in Daily Life Project (hereinafter
            referred to as MDLP) doesn’t seem to be antagonistic towards theoretical work on
            music, the study at hand is far more interested in uncovering and presenting a
            picture of the real world than in constructing (or applying) abstract of models of
            that world. Consequently, this volume is devoted almost exclusively to transcribed
            excerpts from forty-one interviews conducted with Buffalo-area residents on what
            music is about to them (a brief foreword by Lipsitz and an even briefer introduction
            and appendix by Charles Keil comprise the entirety of the critical commentary on
            the study and its findings included here). Taken together, then, the implicit promise
            of these two books is that My Music will provide us with a key to unlocking some
            of the more perplexing mysteries of ‘the local’, while Subcultural Sounds will help
            us understand the ways in which the various locals of the world get stitched together
            to form ‘the global’.
              In the end, however, only Slobin’s volume lives up to its side of this unspoken
            bargain very well. This is not to say that Subcultural Sounds is entirely without
                                                                     2
            flaws. For instance, Slobin repeatedly conflates hegemony and ideology,  he flirts
            with the intentional fallacy school of semiotics (i.e., the meaning of music is
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197