Page 30 - Cultural Studies Volume 11
P. 30

24 CULTURAL STUDIES

            we examine popular representations of cleaning and femininity using the insights
            provided  by  Gruben’s  film,  we  can  see  that  gender,  though  it  appears  to
            constitute a clean opposition, does not do so at all.


                                         Scene 2:
                       Dangerous domesticity and the role of e/liminators

                 It is thus not lack of cleanliness or health that causes abjection but
                 what disturbs identity, system, order. What does not respect borders,
                 positions, rules. The in-between, the ambiguous, the composite.
                                                           (Kristeva, 1982)

            The ‘feminine’ embodies what must trouble and ultimately disrupt any opposition
            —the  in-between,  the  ambiguous,  the  composite—and  this  ‘trouble’  reveals
            itself  readily  in  popular  advertisements  containing  cleaning scenes.  These
            scenes,  invariably  representing  a  middle-class  milieu,  illustrate  the  perverse
            parallels  insistently  constructed  between  cleaning  as  a  practice,  with  certain
            symbolic effects, and feminine gender construction as signification, with kindred
            effects.  These  perverse  parallels  surface  in  representations  of  the  housewife’s
            character and sexuality.
            As a result of the imperatives of purity inferred in various aspects of housework,
            the housewife is placed in what Mary Douglas would call a ‘dangerous’ cultural
            position. In order to clean, to separate, to keep dirt (nature) out, the housewife
            must ‘get her hands dirty’, do the ‘dirty work’. As a cultural cleaning agent, she
            must come into contact with and handle the very pollutions she protects others
            from; she therefore runs the risk of being tainted with them herself. But she must
            also avoid being too clean, or becoming overzealous and maniacal. Mary Douglas
            remarks that

              the quest for purity is pursued by rejection…when purity is not a symbol
              but  something  lived,  it  must  be  poor  and  barren.  Purity  is  the  enemy  of
              change, of ambiguity and compromise…it is an attempt to force experience
              into  logical  categories  of  non-contradiction.  But  experience  is  not
              amenable  and  those  who  make  the  attempt  find  themselves  led  into
              contradiction.
                                                           (1966/1988:161–2)

            Traces or symptoms of the housewife’s liminal and paradoxical role surface in
            advertisements  for  cleansers,  soaps,  dishwashing  liquids,  or  floor-cleaning
            products.  The  same  contradictions  or  paradoxes  noted  in  Gruben’s  film  as
            implicating the central character—between inside and outside, between ‘nature’
            and  ‘culture’—shape  the  character  of  these  products.  In  a  television
            advertisement for an air freshener, three housewives move respectively through a
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35