Page 223 - Cultural Theory and Popular Culture an Introduction
P. 223

CULT_C09.qxd  10/24/08  17:25  Page 207







                                                                             The global postmodern  207



















                       Figure 9.3  ‘Imagine there’s no countries’.





                      therefore both help confirm and help undo local cultures; it can keep one in place and
                      it can make one suddenly feel out of place. For example, in 1946, addressing a confer-
                      ence  of  Spanish  clerics,  the  Archbishop  of  Toledo  wondered  ‘[h]ow  to  tackle’  what
                      he  called  ‘woman’s  growing  demoralization  –  caused  largely  by  American  customs
                      introduced by the cinematograph, making the young woman independent, breaking
                      up the family, disabling and discrediting the future consort and mother with exotic
                      practices that make her less womanly and destabilize the home’ (quoted in Tomlinson,
                      1997: 123). Spanish women may have taken a different view.
                        A third problem with the model of globalization as cultural Americanization is that
                      it assumes that American culture is monolithic. Even in the more guarded accounts of
                      globalization it is assumed that we can identify something singular called American
                      culture. George Ritzer (1999), for example, makes the claim that ‘while we will con-
                      tinue to see global diversity, many, most, perhaps eventually all of those cultures will
                      be  affected  by  American  exports:  America  will  become  virtually  everyone’s  “second
                      culture”’ (89).
                        Globalization as cultural Americanization assumes that cultures can be lined up as
                      distinct  monolithic  entities,  hermetically  sealed  from  one  another  until  the  fatal
                      moment  of  the  globalizing  injection.  Against  such  a  view,  Jan  Nederveen  Pieterse
                      (1995) argues that globalization, as cultural Americanization,


                          overlooks the countercurrents – the impact non-Western cultures have been mak-
                          ing on the West. It downplays the ambivalence of the globalising momentum and
                          ignores  the  role  of  local  reception  of  Western  culture  –  for  example  the  indi-
                          genization of Western elements. It fails to see the influence non-Western cultures
                          have been exercising on one another. It has no room for crossover culture – as in
                          the development of ‘third cultures’ such as world music. It overrates the homo-
                          geneity  of  Western  culture  and  overlooks  the  fact  that  many  of  the  standards
   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228