Page 253 - Cultural Theory and Popular Culture an Introduction
P. 253

CULT_Z01.qxd  10/25/08  16:33  Page 237










                      Notes












                       1. For  a  discussion  of  Shakespeare  as  popular  culture  in  nineteenth-century  America,  see
                         Lawrence Levine (1988).
                       2. Slavoj yizek (1991) identifies the retroactive evaluation which fixed film noir’s current status:
                         ‘It started to exist only when it was discovered by French critics in the ’50s (it is no accident
                         that even in English, the term used to designate this genre is French: film noir). What was, in
                         America itself, a series of low-budget B-productions of little critical prestige, was miracu-
                         lously transformed, through the intervention of the French gaze, into a sublime object of
                         art, a kind of film pendant to philosophical existentialism. Directors who had in America the
                         status of skilled craftsmen, at best, became auteurs, each of them staging in his films a unique
                         tragic vision of the universe’ (112).
                       3. For a discussion of opera in popular culture, see Storey, 2002a, 2003 and 2006.
                       4. See Storey, 2003 and 2005.
                       5. John Docker (1994) refers to her as ‘an old-style colonialist ethnographer, staring with dis-
                         taste at the barbaric ways of strange and unknown people’ (25).
                       6. It is not just that F.R. Leavis offers us an idealized account of the past, which he does; he actu-
                         ally idealizes Bourne’s own account, failing to mention his criticisms of rural life.
                       7. It should be noted, contrary to van den Haag, that Freud is referring to all art, and not just
                         popular culture.
                       8. For another excellent example of ‘history from below’, see Chauncey (1994). As Chauncey
                         explains, ‘As my focus on street-level policing of gender suggests, another of the underlying
                         arguments of this book is that histories of homosexuality – and sex and sexuality more gen-
                         erally – have suffered from their overreliance on the discourse of the elite. The most power-
                         ful elements of American society devised the official maps of the culture. . . . While this book
                         pays those maps their due, it is more interested in reconstructing the maps etched in the city
                         streets by daily habit, the paths that guided men’s practices even if they were never published
                         or otherwise formalized. . . . This book seeks to analyze . . . the changing representation of
                         homosexuality  in  popular  culture  and  the  street-level  social  practices  and  dynamics  that
                         shaped the ways homosexually active men were labelled, understood themselves, and inter-
                         acted with others’ (26–7).
                       9. I remember at secondary school a teacher who encouraged us to bring to music lessons our
                         records by The Beatles, Dylan and The Stones. The class would always end the same way –
                         he would try to convince us of the fundamental error of our adolescent musical taste.
                      10. See Storey (1992).
                      11. See New Left Review (1977).
                      12. See Stedman Jones (1998).
                      13. See Storey (1985).
                      14. ‘We Can Be Together’, from the album Volunteers (1969).
                      15. See Storey (2009).










           ..
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258