Page 280 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 280

254                                                       S.L. Stewart

            focused on restoring balance to the self through relationship with others and the
            environment. This Indigenous conception of education is not new or innovative, it
            has been in existence and successfully employed by Indigenous people in Canada
            and other places for thousands of years, as David suggests in his case study when
            he states that relying on his Grandmother’s wisdom and knowledges for structuring
            classroom  activity  and  curriculum  were  integral to  the  success  of  his  approach.
            What is new is the articulation and validation of this definition as legitimate in the
            context of university research and teaching within an overarching history of oppres-
            sion. Since colonization, western paradigms have been forced on Indigenous peoples
            in ways that invalidated and disregarded successful epistemological and healing
            methods that had previously been available to Indigenous people. As a result, many
            Indigenous communities today flounder in attempts to deal with their education
            problems  by  utilizing  the  only  resource  currently  available  to  them  through  the
            public education system, which is dominated by western models of education and
            psychology. Yet at the same time, we must acknowledge the reality that Indigenous
            people  today  exist  in  both  Indigenous  and  western  worlds  where  a  pedagogical
            approach  that  reflects  this  reality  and  serves  to  offer  up  both  paradigms  in  a
            complementary way, rather than in a dominating or subordinating manner, may be
            appropriate.
              Western-thinking  educators  and  researchers  must  make  significant  changes  in
            order to address needs that are not currently being well met. I propose that university
            academics  could  receive  education  about  Indigenous  peoples’  educational  needs,
            including information about the historical experiences of Indigenous peoples, the
            Indigenous paradigm, and form a comprehensive understanding of their own cultural
            sensitivities in the educational relationship with students and communities. Learning
            from case studies such as David’s could be an invaluable resource for students studying
            to  become  teachers,  and  for  teachers  already  working  with  Indigenous  students.
            Further, postsecondary institutions could build capacity for research in Indigenous
            communities by revising ethical protocols to incorporate Indigenous methodologies,
            especially  Indigenous  knowledges,  into  research  with  Indigenous  groups,  and  by
            recruiting  Indigenous  scholars  through  the  acceptance  of  Indigenous  paradigms
            within the academy.



            Conclusion


            Current literature on Indigenous learning in postsecondary schools in Canada iden-
            tifies and describes some of the most important issues in working with Indigenous
            students in terms of theoretical learning themes and constraints that hinder aca-
            demic success. What is missing is empirical data concerning the needs and goals of
            Indigenous students from a strength or wellness-based model that is grounded in an
            Indigenous paradigm, and how this might look in practice: Chinn and Hana’ike’s
            case study begins to fill this gap by articulating and defining the development of
            culturally relevant and place-based education from a Native Hawaiian perspective
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285