Page 338 - Cultural Studies of Science Education

312 D.B. Zandvliet

embodied approaches in their implementation. Central to this is the idea that our
assumptions about teaching are best enacted when these actions are embedded
deeply within the complexity and authenticity of real communities.

References

Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York:
Teachers College Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans.
Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Science
Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bowers, C. (1999). Changing the dominant cultural perspective in education. In G. Smith &
D. Williams (Eds.), Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture and the
environment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2007). Environmental learning and experience.
Retrieved September 6, 2009, from: http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/environment_ed/.
Bybee, R. W. (1993). Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal reflections.
New York: Teachers College Press.
Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on
school curriculum. Retrieved November 1, 2009, from http://www.cmec.ca/science/framework/
Gardiner, W. L. (1989). Forecasting, planning, and the future of the information society. In
P. Goumain (Ed.), High technology workplaces: Integrating technology, management, and
design for productive work environments (pp. 27–39). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational
Researcher, 32, 3–12.
Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach.
Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socio-scientific material in science-technology-society
science curricula: Some implication for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440.
Hutchinson, D. (2004). A natural history of place in education. New York: Teachers College
Press.
Layton, D. (1993). Technology’s challenge to science education: Cathedral, quarry or company
store. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McBean, G. A., & Hengeveld, H. G. (2000). Communicating the science of climate change.
Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 9–23.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Orr, D. (1994). Earth in mind. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sadler, T., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific
decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 112–148.
Sammel, A., & Zandvliet, D.B. (2003). Science reform or science conform: Problematic episte-
mological assumptions with/in Canadian science reform efforts. Science, Mathematics and
Technology Education, 3(4), 513–520.
Semken, S. (2005). Sense of place and place-based introductory geoscience teaching for American
Indian and Alaska Native undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 149–157.
Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education,
culture and the environment. Albany: State University of New York Press.