Page 343 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 343

26  Envisioning Polysemicity: Generating Insights into the Complexity  317

            Arizona’s long history of land seizing (often for mining purposes). My point in
            mentioning these stakeholders is that each brings his or her own cultural identity
            and individual narratives that comprise peoples’ histories, and clearly this situation
            is fraught with economic, spiritual, political, cultural, and historical complexities.
              Given  that  the  situation  is  quite  more  complicated  than  a  simple  “for”  or
            “against” binary relating to the mine (Thompson 2008), a different way of framing
            this conflict moves beyond the dichotomies presented by positioning the argument
            around the interests of the Apache versus the group of townspeople that are pro-mine.
            Rather, it is more fruitful to consider the complexities of place and contested areas
            by incorporating what Joe Kincheloe and Kenneth Tobin have referred to as “the
            power of contextualization” (2006, p. 9), to highlight the personal and contextual-
            ized nature of a given situation. A critical epistemology of complexity (Kincheloe
            2001) can serve to situate the unfolding struggles in Superior within the broader
            sociocultural, political, and historical context and provide a lens with which to
            connect back to the possibilities in place-based education. Such a critical complex
            lens on this work can illuminate the oppressions in the communities so that they can
            be addressed and confronted, without necessarily pitting the indigenous peoples as
            existing in de facto opposition to the more recent residents. As the focus is shifted
            we are able to look at both the details of positions of these populations as well as
            the broader practices that reproduce inequities.
              Ironically a multinational corporation and the US Congress have the potential to
            dictate the fate of this land, which has huge implications of both cultural sustain-
            ability and ecological integrity of the area. The globalization of industry, labor, and
            capital is evident in transnational corporations like Resolution Copper Mining, a
            division  of  Rio  Tinto,  which  is  a  British/Australian  mining  company  based  in
            London. In the context of a geo-global economy, there is little expectation of a
            vested sense of commitment toward environmental justice and to a community.




            Working Toward Sustainability and Community Survival


            The complexity of this particular contested space is highlighted for me in reading the
            points that the authors have made about the possibilities for cultural sustainability
            and ecological integrity presented by the rejecting of the mine and the resulting land
            swap. This contrasts starkly with the support of the mine by community residents.
            Cultural sustainability and ecological integrity are intertwined and cannot be easily
            separated. In this particular situation in Superior, there is a dispute over a deeply
            meaningful place, which emphasizes the importance in contested areas to try to find
            a way to work with the other toward socially and environmentally just outcomes. In
            discussing the environmental justice movement, Robert Bullard explained:
              The environment is everything: where we live, work, play, go to school, as well as the
              physical and natural world. And so we can’t separate the physical environment from the
              cultural environment. We have to talk about making sure that justice is integrated through-
              out all the stuff that we do. (Schweizer 1999)
   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348