Page 357 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 357

332                                                       J.D. Adams

              In particular, in one exhibit there is a display case that demonstrates the many
            uses of the coconut plant within Pacific communities. On display are a wide variety
            of artifacts derived from coconuts – jewelry, bowls, twine, armor, money, and so
            forth. In science teacher education workshops, I ask participants to observe this
            case and ponder the question, “what science do people have to know and under-
            stand in order to make and use these objects?” A few moments of observation pass
            and the teacher participants begin to discuss the complexity of scientific under-
            standing that people of these cultures need in order to survive over the long term.
            As a group, we converse about the biological, chemical, and physical understand-
            ings needed to fashion the resources of coconut plants into the variety of forms on
            display.  Have  people  lost  these  unique  connections  with  the  natural  world?
            Interestingly, usually some of my teacher participants are originally from tropical
            environments (e.g., Africa, Caribbean, Latin America). These teachers immedi-
            ately identify with the coconut plant artifacts and provide the kinds of perspectives
            that allow us to think about the ways in which the coconut plant is utilized within
            their  own  cultural  communities.  Is  this  science  education?  It  surely  cultivates
            discussions about other ways that people around the world share knowledge about
            the environment in clever ways. For workshop attendees, this experience is a first
            step in recognizing the value of scientific knowledge embedded (even taken for
            granted) within their own cultural histories and practices. Reflecting back, these
            activities serve as a form of decolonization, where the goal becomes one of recog-
            nizing the ingenuity of how science and technology is indeed inseparable from the
            creation  and  use  of  coconut  artifacts  uniquely  situated  in  different  cultural  and
            ecogeographical contexts.


            Heterogeneity in Indigeneity


            The coconut plant’s origin is disputed. There is a question of whether it originated
            in South Asia or Latin America. Through a natural history of “accidental” and
            unnatural historically deliberate migration, the coconut plant ends up around the
            globe and manages to send out roots and become an integral part of the natural
            landscape. In the case of volcanic islands, the presence of the coconut plant makes
            it possible for other plants to emigrate, survive, and be able to mate, adapt, and
            evolve in a new place, that is, become endemic to a new place. Correspondingly,
            people maintain their indigenous connections with native lands while others, who
            were once indigenous to an area, are either forced or voluntary migrate to different
            locales.  These  people  establish  roots  in  a  new  place.  Maori  scholar  Elizabeth
            McKinley (2007) recognizes that indigeneity is not a singular construct, rather it
            is as complex and heterogeneous as the people the term attempts to define and
            ranges  from  people  subjugated  in  their  ancestral  lands  to  those  who  are  still
            removed from their lands today (often only to be subjugated elsewhere). Glenn
            Aikenhead and Masakata Ogawa (2007) suggest the term “neo-indigenous” to
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362