Page 358 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 358

28  One Hundred Ways to Use a Coconut                           333

            signify a “long-standing, nonEurocentric, mainstream culture” (p. 555) not necessarily
            related to the first people’s culture who inhabit an area. Concomitantly, there are
            groups of people who are neither First Nations nor mainstream. For example,
            the Maroons of Jamaica and Surinam are relatively indigenous in their way of
            life, indicating that indigenous knowledge is not essential. Therefore, indigeneity
            connotes ways of knowing that are nonEurocentric, often place-based and often
            subjugated to Eurocentric cultural and political worldviews, what Sandra Harding
            (1998) describes as “Europology … metaphors, models, narratives, and discur-
            sive  resources”  that  “are  those  of  European  history,  not  of  Asian,  African,  or
            some other history” (p. 91).
              Ladislaus Semali and Joe Kincheloe (1999) further define indigenous knowl-
            edge as:
              The dynamic way in which the residents of an area have come to understand themselves in
              relationship to their natural environment and how they organize that folk knowledge of
              flora and fauna, cultural beliefs, and history to enhance their lives. (p. 3)
            In other words, indigenous knowledge is deeply rooted in place, with “place” being
            both  an  external,  physical  construct  as  well  as  internally  constituted.  “Because
            Indigenous peoples’ identities are imbued with a sense of place, place becomes
            a part of their inner space” (Aikenhead and Ogawa 2007, p. 560). This internal
            constitution of “place” is important for considering the confluence of place-based
            education, justice, and indigenous knowledge systems in science education. It is
            this  internalization  of  place  that  enabled  people  like  African  slaves  and  Indian
            indentured servants to survive in the Americas, while recreating many aspects of
            their  culture,  including  language,  religion,  and  food.  It  is  through  this  lens  that
            people view their connections with the lands they inhabit.
              What I understand about the natural world starts with my mother’s Jamaican
            neo-indigenous worldview. Coming from a rural and agricultural background, my
            mother’s  stories  inform  my  thinking  about  and  being  in  the  natural  world.
            Learning and then eventually teaching science, I found that some of the things
            that I was taught conflicted with how I understood the world to be. Now I ques-
            tion these things. For example, I learned to appreciate insects when my mother
            caught them and put them in our hands to observe them. She encouraged us to
            release them through an open window. She once allowed a treehopper that came
            in with the cabbage to live in a plastic cup on the dining table until it decided to
            leave. This way of being conflicted with the ideas learned in my science methods
            courses where we caught insects, ethered them, pinned, classified, and displayed
            them for a grade. In contrast, I learned as much about appreciating and identifying
            insects while keeping them alive as I did when they were pinned and dead in
            my  formal  education.  Students  experience  these  sorts  of  tensions  when  their
            traditional  knowledge  is  both  challenged  and  examined  as  suspect  in  science
            classrooms.
              “I say it again: Science has not been neutral nor colorblind. hurt could not cure. comrade,
              Bliss ain’t playing.” Josefina Baez, performance artist
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363