Page 434 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 434

Chapter 34
            Responding to Glocalisation
            and Foundationalism in Science and Math



            Dawn Sutherland and Denise Henning







            Dear Denise,
              I just returned from Thailand. It was an interesting experience teaching a science
            methods  course  for  Canadian  pre-service  teachers  completing  their  education
            degree overseas. Something interesting happened while I was there. As part of the
            course, my students were required to create a portfolio of cultural and local exam-
            ples  from  Thai  culture  that  would  help  create  early  and  middle  years’  science
            experiences  that  were  more  locally  relevant.  When  I  explained  the  assignment,
            students just stared at me, and asked, “why would we want to do that?” You see,
            my Canadian students realized very quickly that one of the purposes behind Thai
            students  attending  English  schools  in  Thailand  is  to  become  more  aware  of
            eurowestern culture. So, both my past and recent experiences help me relate to Drs.
            Luitel  and  Taylor’s  chapter  on  the  impact  a  non-critical  presentation  of  global
            (really eurowestern) education has on non-eurowestern educational systems.
              Do you remember when we first met? I felt I had to work so hard to earn your
            trust as a non-Aboriginal researcher in Indigenous science education. We had to have
            many conversations and meetings to talk about what Indigenous science education
            is and how important personal stories and local community are to learning. It was
            only after several meetings that we realized we were both very grounded in our own
            culture and localities, yet able to respectfully discuss Aboriginal issues from our
            unique viewpoints and examine them from a broader perspective. Perhaps this is
            what Luitel and Taylor are talking about when describing glocalisation, that it is the
            ability to see the interplay of dominant agendas in your own worldview, a worldview
            that is a result of local and global influences, and the worldview of others.
              While reading Luitel and Taylor’s chapter, I reflected on the feasibility of creat-
            ing  a  contextualized  and  inclusive  mathematics  and  science  teacher  education
            program. I would have liked to see some examples of the teacher education pro-
            gram that the authors claim addresses glocalisation and foundationalism. I can see


            D. Sutherland
            University of Winnipeg
            D. Henning
            University College of the North


            D.J. Tippins et al. (eds.), Cultural Studies and Environmentalism,    409
            Cultural Studies of Science Education Vol. 3, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3929-3_34,
            © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439