Page 438 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 438

34  Responding to Glocalisation and Foundationalism in Science and Math  413

            a eurowestern approach by using the term “glocalisation” to make it more palatable
            to scholars within the academy.
              Dawn, I would agree with you on your realisation of exclusion of other perspectives
            in Luitel and Taylor’s ideas regarding the kind of impact a non-critical presentation
            of global (really eurowestern) education has on non-eurowestern education. This
            perspective  is  in  fact  counter  to  what  the  SAGE  conference  participants  and
            Aboriginal science educators believe constitutes positive educational outcomes – a
            strong foundation in cultural teaching grounded in language. According to these
            educators, a grounding in land-based experiential learning approaches that make
            learning real and a part of the everyday lifeways of Aboriginal learners is vital to
            principles of Indigenous learning. Students need to know who they are and that
            their identity is something to be proud of and recognized as important by educators
            in order to participate in a lifelong learning process. In fact your statement that
            “students can then examine more global ideas with an ability to evaluate “foreign”
            ideas from their own Indigenous worldview,” encapsulates the findings from the
            SAGE conference.
              Regardless of how I have interpreted the writing of Luitel and Taylor, it is my
            hope that the implementation of their approach provides learners with a positive
            mathematics educational experience. As always, by embracing the local as having
            its  own  value  to  the  education  of  the  local  learners,  learners  can  then  critically
            evaluate the eurowestern foundations they will ultimately encounter.
              In  closing,  I  am  always  hopeful  when  researchers  move  away  from  the
            eurowestern approaches of foundationalism to that of a community-based, recipro-
            cal and land-based approach that creates a living–learning environment for science
            and  mathematics  education.  Perhaps  including  the  voices  and  ideas  of  local
            community and teachers in the creation of inclusive and contextualised science and
            mathematics curricula will further the ideas of Luitel and Taylor.
              Warmest regards,
              Denise



            References


            Sutherland, D. L., & Henning, D. (2009). Ininiwi-Kiskanītamowin: A framework for long-term
              science education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 9,
              173–190.
            Waziyatawin, A. W., & Yellow Bird, M. (2005). For indigenous eyes only. Santa Fe: School of
              American Research Press.
   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443