Page 488 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 488

39  Ecodemocracy and School Science                             463

            Absurdity and Irrationality in Cultural Studies
            and Environmentalism

              The absurd is the essential concept and the first truth. (Albert Camus 1913–1960)

            Why do we need heterogeneity for human survival and reproduction? We now have
            gene manipulation sciences which can be used to select the very best characteristics
            for our children. Why not? Who wants a child with serious birth defects – speech,
            sight, touch, taste, or intellect? It is absurd to think that for the sake of “cultural
            diversity” we should protect and conserve people with limited abilities, learning
            disabilities, and DNA for schizophrenia and despicable crimes. When these things
            can be selected out of the equation for parents, will not those who care for their
            children most prefer those characteristics of offspring that make sense in terms of
            human viability and reproductive potential? In terms of the taken-for-granted ethical
            imperative  for  human  survival  –  yes!  How  could  one  argue  that  they  would
            conserve those things above? With rapidly increasing technologies, it is easier to
            sort humans into capabilities and potentialities, similar to the ways in which they
            have been sorted throughout history. Already there exists “genetic counseling” and
            other meditations for parents who want to take advantage of “knowing” ahead of
            time what advantages and disadvantages could be predicted for their children in US
            society.




            Why Grow Old?


            Genetic human engineering holds the promise of curing dodgy diseases and holds
            the possibility of changing phenotypes for whatever is popular, trendy, or stylish,
            within our society. These things used to grasp an appeal for those interested in
            science fiction books and 1950s films. But today, these things retain more wide-
            spread appeal, yet in different forms, which are taken for granted. For example,
            why grow old? There is a widespread spotlight on expanding the life span, which
            is a highly lucrative market in the USA and Europe (e.g., $50 billion in the USA!).
            Antiaging  products  involve  nutrition,  exercise  programs,  hormones,  skin  care,
            supplements  and  herbs,  and  ancient  remedies,  cosmetic  procedures,  and  more
            recently, reducing harmful diseases. Since the average life span within different
            world  human  populations  is  lowered  by  destructive  diseases  and  nutritional
              problems – causing infant and child mortality – there is currently a significant focus
            on  eliminating  cancers  and  cardiovascular  diseases  and  other  limiting  variables.
            Theoretically,  if  we  could  replace  damaged  bodies  by  rejuvenating  deteriorated
            cells and tissues, why shouldn’t we? It is absurd that people should have to die
            early from destructive aging issues. From a cultural diversity standpoint, we discri-
            minate against the elderly when we do not ensure their participation more fully in
            the democratic-decision processes of the community and environment, in a way
            where they are afforded equal opportunity so they would take part in full mind and
   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493