Page 489 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 489

464                                           M.P. Mueller and D.J. Tippins

            body  (what  sort  of  person  would  deny  their  grandparents  or  elders  the  medical
            treatments or technological advantages needed?)



            Democracy for the Dead (or Unborn)


            Would it not be cool to live forever! The dead are dead! Or do the dead partake in
            some forms of ecodemocracy through spirits, ghosts, apparitions, or advocates of
            extrasensory perception (ESP)? If they do, “the dead” should be included more
            fully through ecodemocracy, because they are part of the broad spectrums that blur
            a boundary between life and death within the larger ecologies of the supernatural
            world (albeit it is seldom considered “normal” to embrace and value a “sixth sense”
            in  the  environmental  sciences).  Diversity  scholars,  multiculturalists,  and  educa-
            tional  pluralists  limit  diversity  when  not  considering  the  dead  (and  the  unborn)
            significant enough to address as cultural identities. Indeed, there are many cultural
            traditions for the dead and nonliving spirits (e.g., El Día de los Muertos). What are
            the ways that the dead could be more fully included in science education? What
            ways could the dead become alive again through gene reinvigoration? Cloning cells
            and tissues appear to be a viable option or freezing entire bodies for those who are
            seeking limitless lives forever solidified at negative 130°C in aluminum containers.
            Could these peoples’ spirits or actual lives be raised from death? Is “death” a demo-
            cratic matter? If people could decide, it is likely that some individuals would select
            to die based on the most democratic option – when they would like to die. Perhaps,
            certain people would not want to die. For example, if an ecologically sophisticated
            sort of human were developed by science, why die? It is also true that some decide
            when to die by way of a gun, knife, or rope, and it makes sense that these choices
            are  democratic  (suicide  decisions  are  the  third  leading  cause  of  teenage  death).
            Some older individuals elect to die through euthanasia when they are terminally ill,
            and others decide when and where to terminate a pregnancy (e.g., rape, Down’s
            syndrome, or Spina bifida). The point is that death is democratic. However, the
            justifications for why to postpone death are vulnerable and threatened. Nevertheless,
            societal  laws  do  not  tolerate  for  all  types  of  euthanasia,  suicide,  or  infanticide.
            Withstanding the freedoms we have in choice of death, democracy seems to per-
            petuate a sort of ecological violence or Earth pressure. On the other hand, if democracy
            is extended for nonhuman animal species, then it seems logical to include it as a
            movement with education for the ecodemocracy of all organisms.



            Unbiased Diseases


            Who would you want to bring back from the dead? Would it be a dog, cat, fish, or
            other family pet? Would it be your favorite aunt, grandparent, neighbor, teacher,
            or even a child who never had the chance to live the life they deserved to live?
   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494