Page 58 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 58

34                                                       M.L. Bentley

            Ethics and Urgency


            Martusewicz, Lupinacci, and Schnakenberg provide an underlying ethic in their
            foundation for ecojustice education based upon the sacredness of the complex eco-
            system upon which all life depends. The provision for ethics as an aspect of content
            in the science curriculum also was a concern of Dewey and has a long history in
            science education. In 1937, Dewey said, “The formation of the attitude ... is the
            work and responsibility of the school more than of any other single institution”
            (1987, p. 254). This concern has particularly been a focus of feminist critiques (Zell
            1998). Certainly science education includes both cognitive and affective dimen-
            sions and we need to be more concerned about developing students’ attitudes and
            motivations. In the words of Stephen Jay Gould (1994), “we cannot win this battle
            to save species and environments without forging an emotional bond between our-
            selves and nature … for we will not fight to save what we do not love” (p. 4). An
            education that excludes an ethics foundation can lead to a self-centered, rudderless
            citizenry. According to the late Senator Gaylord Nelson (1997):
              Ironically, an issue at least of equal importance to population is rarely noted or mentioned
              anywhere. Yet it is the key to our environmental future. The absence of a pervasive, guiding
              conservation ethic in our culture is the issue and the problem. Society’s answer must be to
              focus its attention and energies on nurturing a conservation generation imbued with a con-
              servation  ethic.  Without  such  a  guiding  cultural  ethic,  society  will  not  have  the
              understanding, motivation, conviction or political will to persist in addressing the truly hard

              questions that will confront us in the decades to come. (pp. 38–39)
            To develop an ethic of ecological sustainability science educators ought to become
            familiar with deep ecology, conservation biology, bioregionalism, ecofeminism, and
            socially critical analysis (Corcoran and Sievers 1994). This task is all the more critical
            in our time as distress signals from one ecosystem after another become harder and
            harder to ignore. Croplands, forests, and grasslands, systems that support the world
            economy, are under varying degrees of stress and degradation in almost all places
            including the USA (Worldwatch Institute 2009). NASA tells us that the ten warmest
            years on record all occur within the 12-year period 1997–2008 (Goddard 2009). I am
            not advocating that educators should teach from a crisis mode, but it is long past time
            to begin educating a generation of students on how to live in a world of ecological
            scarcity and to help them learn how to create a more sustainable society.




            More Examples of EcoJustice Education in Practice

            Martusewicz,  Lupinacci,  and  Schnakenberg  focus  primarily  on  schooling,  but
            learning  is  broader  than  schooling.  Museums  and  other  institutions  of  informal
            education could play a prominent role in ecojustice education, both for students and
            in professional development for teachers. Science learning in informal settings can
            complement  classroom  science  goals  and  encourage  connections  with  the  local
            community (Bell et al. 2009).
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63