Page 119 - Culture Society and Economy
P. 119

Robotham-06.qxd  1/31/2005  6:24 PM  Page 112






                     CULTURE, SOCIETY AND ECONOMY

                        There is a real contradiction in Castells’ work between this technological
                     determinism and his ‘identitarianism’. This stands out clearly if one goes
                     back to an earlier essay written in 1993 and a later work by Carnoy. 41
                     In Castells’ analysis in The New Global Economy in the Information Age,
                     the entire thesis rests upon technological determinism. In the chapters
                     by Carnoy and especially Cohen, but also by Castells himself, there is
                     no mention of the role of culture, community or identity in the new
                     global economy, although this work is clearly an important early version
                     of Castells’ later ideas. 42  It is the transformations wrought by Japanese
                     production systems and information technology which are held responsi-
                     ble for the transformation of the global economy and even the collapse
                                        43
                     of the Soviet Union. Moreover, the analysis of the position of transna-
                     tional corporations in this work does not in any way put forward the thesis
                     that their power is in any way diminished by these technological changes.
                     On the contrary, in the chapters by Carnoy and Cohen, it is precisely the
                     opposite point which is repeatedly made. The adoption of Japanese pro-
                     duction techniques, flatter organizational forms, and the application of
                     information technology have, if anything, made transnational corporations
                     even more powerful, both in the national and world economies, as Harrison
                     established more than ten years ago. Harrison proved that flexible pro-
                                                      44
                     duction systems did not simply create ‘network enterprises’ but ‘large
                     firm-centered networked production systems’. 45
                        At the opening of his chapter published in 1993, Carnoy, for example,
                     wrote:

                        Large multinational enterprises (known as MNEs) continue to grow rapidly
                        and to influence changes in the world economy. They also dominate trade
                        among the industrialized countries and control international capital move-
                        ments. In the rapid informatization and internalization of production and
                        distribution, much of the innovation (R&D) in information technology takes
                        place in the MNEs or is financed by them, especially as the cost of innova-
                        tion has risen. 46

                     Even Castells himself in his chapter, although he refers to a new ‘flexibil-
                     ity and decentralization in production and management’, shows his general
                     line of argument is the same as the book as a whole: A technological revo-
                     lution has transformed large corporations and the world economy which
                     they continue to dominate. 47  It is true that all the authors of this work,
                     Carnoy and Cohen in particular, strongly uphold the thesis that the global
                     ‘geo-economy’ is one dominated by the most powerful nation–states in
                     which countries the most powerful corporations originate and are based.
                     But the grounds on which this is maintained are not communitarian ones.


                                                    112
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124