Page 34 - Culture Society and Economy
P. 34

Robotham-02.qxd  1/31/2005  6:21 PM  Page 27






                                                   POLITICS AS CULTURE: STUART HALL

                of how this popular mass consciousness of consent was to be understood
                and, where necessary, critiqued. These were some of the central ques-
                tions which arose in the context of the time, which Hall felt it necessary
                to attempt to answer, within the Marxist framework.
                  Basing himself on Marx, Hall argued that spontaneous forms of con-
                sciousness, popular as well as scholarly, arise from the surface of economic
                life which is what people actually experience. In the case of capitalist
                society what this ‘surface’ amounts to, is the market and exchange relations,
                be these in consumption, production, finance or the labor market. This
                reaction to the surface of life as it necessarily appears in consciousness
                therefore has a material base – conditioned by how and where one is posi-
                tioned in the marketplace. This is the reason why consumerism, hedonism,
                narcissism, exhibitionism, self-centeredness – reflexivity if you will – the
                spontaneous forms of consciousness in developed capitalist societies which,
                as Weber was at pains to point out, have long relieved themselves of their
                Protestant ethic. All the efforts of neo-conservatives to revive such an
                ethic collapse in hopeless failure amidst the consumerist plenty of the
                developed capitalist economy. The refinements of consumerist luxury
                prove simply too much to resist, first and foremost for the members of
                the conservative elite itself. As Weber long ago pointed out, all attempts
                to give an ethical foundation to modern monopoly capitalist civilization in
                its present state, are simply non-starters, likely to collapse either in hypo-
                critical farce, or worse, to degenerate into a ‘blood and soil’ atavism of the
                worst anti-human kind.
                  This spontaneous consciousness is therefore ‘true’ in the sense that it
                does arise from particular material experiences. However, this is only a
                partial and one-sided truth and therefore no truth at all. This is because
                experience based on the market actually conceals more than it reveals
                about the deeper and more far-reaching economic and social processes at
                work. These processes are to be found in the sphere of production. Even
                in the sphere of production they are by no means immediately obvious.
                Only a profound analysis of the ‘hidden abode’ of production – in other
                words, intense intellectual effort which critiques the shallowness and
                one-sided nature of ‘experience’ – can overcome the false consciousness
                generated by the capitalist system itself.
                  False consciousness therefore is a reality and it springs from reality. It
                is a reality in its popular form as much as in its scholarly and expert form.
                Indeed, it may be more widespread in academia and among elites than it
                is among the mass of ordinary people. It is not necessarily superficial,
                even though it derives from experience. Experience is not disconnected
                from reality but is an expression of it. Therefore, at crucial moments and


                                               27
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39